Laserfiche WebLink
(c) The applicant states that she wishes to rezone this property to increase the parking <br />availability for the existing restaurant. However, the entire lot comprising 2785 Hubbard <br />Street is requested for rezoning. While the following scenario may not occur, nonetheless <br />if rezoned, the entire lot could be legally developed for any General Retail (GR) use <br />(presuming size, setbacks, and environmental considerations are met). For example, some <br />permitted GR uses include: tire retreading and capping; new auto accessory and parts <br />sales store; restaurant with and without drive —in service; and retail stores and shops <br />offering goods for sale. These (and other GR permitted uses) would be intrusive into the <br />existing single — family residential neighborhood. <br />Option 2. Recommend denial of this rezoning request. <br />(a) The city staff recommends this option for the reasons that follow. <br />(b) The existing zoning within this subject property's environs indicates a single — family <br />(SF -2) corridor extending east and west of South Collegiate Drive, along Hubbard Street. <br />The Future Land Use Plan map (FLUP) also recommends Low Density Residential <br />(LDR) single — family uses along this same corridor. The existing General Retail Zoning <br />District indicated above and adjacent to the single — family lots at the northeast corner of <br />South Collegiate Drive and Hubbard Street remain the same configuration on the FLUP <br />(shown as Retail); therefore, both the existing zoning and future land use <br />recommendations do not show extension of the retail use as proposed by this rezoning <br />request. <br />(c) Although separated by Hubbard Street and Collegiate Street, the lots on the south, <br />southeast, southwest, east, and west sides of this subject property have single — family <br />homes located upon them; the lot immediately west and adjacent to the subject property <br />is also an existing single — family home. These facts further reinforce the existing single — <br />family characterization and stability within the immediately surrounding area of this <br />subject property. <br />(d) Although perhaps unlikely, by rezoning this property to General Retail (GR), future <br />requests to change the use of the adjacent and/or nearby single — family homes and/or lots <br />into retail uses could occur. (This situation has occurred in parts of the U.S., causing <br />displacement and disruption of once stable residential populations.) Rezoning to GR at <br />this time would weaken the argument to avoid or stop the "sprawl" of future GR uses into <br />this subject area and neighborhood. <br />(e) Approval represents Spot Zoning. <br />3 <br />