Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT P (continued) <br />2. The City's Isset to liability ratio decreased by 44.5% in the year ending <br />September 30, 2001. Total assets decreased by $677,895 and total liabilities <br />increased by $825,199. <br />3. Cash coverage of general fund balance decreased from 32.4% to 18% for the year <br />ending September 30, 2001. General fund cash balance decreased by $4,308,791. <br />4. Actual expenditures for fiscal year 2000 -2001 exceeded actual revenues by <br />$2,470,698. <br />5. Total fund balance as a percent of expenditures dropped from 35.6% to 23.2% for <br />the year ending September 30, 2001. <br />6. The appropriate fund balance level is related to more than the level of <br />expenditures. Emergency contingencies, economic conditions, and other factors <br />must be considered. The 5% rule quoted in the letter also states "...a larger <br />balance may be warranted, particularly if budget revenue and expense are <br />economically sensitive or otherwise not easily forecasted." The letter also states <br />"... it seems reasonable... that a municipality would want to maintain a higher <br />reserve level in uncertain financial circumstances, when the likelihood of drawing <br />on the balance is greater." All of the general fund's primary revenue sources <br />(property taxes, sales taxes, and franchise taxes are sensitive to economic <br />fluctuations. That certainly describes our current situation. <br />7. The letter states that the City's credit rating is A2. Moody's Financial Service is <br />quoted discussing this rating " Factors giving security to principal and interest are <br />considered adequate, but elements may be present that suggest a susceptibility to <br />impairment some time in the future." Translation: the City is not a bottomless pit <br />of money. <br />In addition to the above updated financial information, the following factors should be <br />considered. <br />1. The cost of the petition in the first year alone would be $507,627. This amount <br />would increase each year. <br />2. Much of the general fund balance decrease was anticipated and planned for <br />by management. In order to avoid a tax rate spike, general fund balance was <br />allowed to grow in anticipation of the $2,609,419 spent on Fire Department <br />stations and equipment. <br />3. Revenues for 2001 -2002 are expected to fall $762,318 below budget. Increased <br />property tax values may provide some relief, but overall projected revenues for <br />2002 -2003 are expected to be approximately $500,000 below current year budget. <br />4. A certificate df obligation issue of over $6,000,000 is expected in September 2002 <br />adding $485,000 to annual debt payments. <br />5. Any general fund balance lower than amount equal to two months operating <br />expenditures is fiscally irresponsible. A three -month operating expenditure fund <br />balance is preferred. Justification for this can be seen as recently as the December <br />2000 ice storm, which caused the City to spend approximately 1.7 million dollars <br />that had not been budgeted. Even though partial reimbursement of these funds <br />was available, the money had to be on hand to deal with the immediate situation. <br />