Laserfiche WebLink
204 <br /> <br /> <br /> Mr. Vest said he would like to discuss the Board of the Texas <br /> Workforce Commission. He said that Judge Loughmiller was <br /> considered to be the C.E.O. of Lamar County. He said all of <br /> the agencies, the Texas Employment Commission, the J.T.P.A. <br /> Program, all training funds and approximately twenty-nine State <br /> and Federal agencies have been merged into one under Senate <br /> Bill 642 and House Bill 1865. He said our nine county region <br /> is considering a plan to create a local workforce development <br /> board. He said he had several questions in connection with <br /> this board. He said if we go with this program as it is <br /> proposed by the Ark-Tex Council of Governments that it is very <br /> slanted towards Texarkana and Bowie County. He said this is a <br /> very important issue and these local workforce development <br /> boards determine whether the County can get the workforce funds. <br /> <br /> Mr. Vest said another very important item he needed to discuss <br /> with the Board at this meeting dealt with the BITCO operation. <br /> He said the Board had approved participation with BITCO to <br /> · build the building on this site and serve as their landlord for <br /> three years. He said the board has agreed to a participating <br /> loan with the Northeast Texas Economic Development District and <br /> asked the bank consortium to get S.B.A. 7(a) approval. Mr. <br /> Vest said that the S.B.A. 7(a) portion has not been denied, but <br /> we have not been able to obtain approval. He said Ridley <br /> Briggs is heading up the lending agency making the request, and <br /> he told Mr. Vest that approval may be six weeks away. Mr. Vest <br /> said that if they wait another six weeks they have taken BITCO <br /> out of a year's worth of business. Mr. Vest said that in <br /> looking at alternative methods to fund the project, he would <br /> like to suggest that the Economic Development Corporation step <br /> in and become the guarantor for that loan, much in the same way <br /> that the S.B.A. would have been the guarantor, so we can proceed <br /> with that project. Mr. Vest said that the Board would be <br /> guaranteeing $270,000.00. He said we will not actually be <br /> putting up the money, and we will not be expending the money <br /> unless the business fails. He said it was a guarantee <br /> situation. <br /> <br /> President Cecil said that in conversation with Mr. Briggs on <br /> this date, he said S.B.A. has not turned this down at this time, <br /> but there is going to be at best a substantial amount of <br /> remaining time involved in getting the approval through S.B.A. <br /> if it's done at all. Mr. Cecil said, with that in mind, a <br /> suggestion was made that perhaps the P.E.D.C. could step in, in <br /> the place of S.B.A. and simply guarantee the bank loan as <br /> S.B.A. would have done. He said if this Board felt that it was <br /> appropriate for us to step in with that guarantee, it would be <br /> the same as the S.B.A. guarantee of 75% of $360,000 which is <br /> $270,000.00. He said that is assuming that the banks would be <br /> agreeable to doing that with the P.E.D.C. guarantee. He said <br /> this has not been formally presented to the banks at this <br /> time. Mr. Cecil said the building funds are not at risk since <br /> the building could be used for other purposes. He said the <br /> other agreement was to front $62,500.00 to the Northeast Texas <br /> Economic Development Corporation as our part of that loan which <br /> was a second lien loan on the equipment. He said if the loan <br /> of $62,500.00 was repaid, then this amount would flow on <br /> through as credit that we have for additional loans in this <br /> area. Mr. Cecil said in the guarantee situation, we would have <br /> first lien position which would be secured by the assets of the <br /> corporation. He said our lien would be first and the second <br /> lien behind ours would be the Northeast Texas Economic <br /> Development Corporation. Mr. Cecil asked for comments from the <br /> boardmembers. After discussion, it was the consensus of the <br /> boardmembers to see the project through. Boardmember Bray said <br /> he was in agreement, but felt that the building design needs to <br /> be something that can be worked into someone else's plans. <br /> President Cecil said that was a point well taken and the <br /> building should be a multi-purpose building. <br /> <br /> <br />