My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/21/2005 MINUTES
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
>
1972-2016
>
2000-2015
>
2005
>
04/21/2005 MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2017 3:14:15 PM
Creation date
2/21/2017 3:14:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 21, 2005 <br />Page 2 <br />less. He stated said fees and insurance are standard practice at other <br />airfields. <br />Ms. Wright reported that Mr. Leubbert went on to list what he felt were the <br />problems in not requiring insurance: (1) we could end up a defendant in a <br />lawsuit if an unlicensed mechanic works on plane, it crashes, and we knew <br />he was there without insurance and did nothing about it. Although we have <br />immunity, that last part could hurt us; (2) it can hurt long -term viability of the <br />airport if the local mechanic shuts down and we end up with none; (3) most <br />importantly, if we accept federal grant money, we have to affirm that we're <br />policing the minimum standards that make the airfield support itself by <br />generating a revenue stream, which our current maintenance facility does <br />provide to us and tailgaters do not, and that don't unnecessarily expose <br />airfield to risk. He stated that, if the airport violates those, the FAA could <br />require repayment of grant monies. Ms. Wright stated that Mr. Leubbert <br />offered to put any mechanic in touch with the mechanics on his airfield to <br />help them find out where they can get insurance. <br />The Board asked what action needed to be taken, and Ms. Wright advised that <br />the Board could either recommend that the standard be left as is or <br />recommend a revision to the Council. She stated that, if nothing was done to <br />the current standards, then she would have to ensure that the current <br />insurance requirements are being adhered to, especially since the City is <br />currently seeking grant funds to build new hangars. She told the Board that, <br />as part of the grant application, she would have to sign assurances that the <br />minimum standards were being enforced, and she would not sign something <br />she wasn't certain was true. Andy Fasken recommended that the existing <br />standards be enforced. Ms. Wright stated she would look into any needed <br />revisions to the ordinance in order to streamline the current permit process. <br />No action was taken. <br />3. Recommending to the City Council a replacement for outgoing Board member <br />James Proctor. Motion to recommend Bill Boothe or Pete Miller was made by <br />Andy Fasken, seconded by Harold Michaelwicz. Motion carried 6 -0. <br />4. Receipt of report from the Airport Director. <br />A. Status ofhangarconstruction project. Ms. Wright advised thatthe letter <br />to TxDOT advising that the airport did wish to utilize the grant funds <br />had been sent. She stated that a follow -up for additional information <br />had been received by the City, and she would gather all the necessary <br />information and send it to TxDOT next week. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.