My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2017 LAMAR COUNTY MITIGATION PLAN
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2017
>
02 - FEBRUARY
>
02/27/2017
>
13 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2017 LAMAR COUNTY MITIGATION PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2017 10:38:32 AM
Creation date
2/23/2017 2:11:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lamar County Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan <br />Chapter Three <br />3.2 HAZARD ASSESSMENTS <br />The Hazard Profiles, found in following sections, were prepared for each identified natural hazard <br />and assess the hazard per the following eight categories. <br />1. Description: Identification and description of hazards likely to affect the multi - <br />jurisdictional area along with the sources used to identify these hazards. <br />2. Location: The location or geographic area affected by each natural hazard along <br />with a map of the areas affected. <br />3. Extent: Extent describes the hazard's impact in terms of potential severity of impact <br />that the hazard event is capable of inflicting upon the county and sixteen <br />jurisdictions. Classification methods such as the Fujita Scale and Richter Scales are <br />used to illustrate extent. Due to the limited amount of county and city specific <br />documented data, the analysis for determining potential severity was limited to <br />50 <br />with little damage <br />Dam or Barrier Failure <br />No record of previous <br />Unlikely <br />Pat Mayes Lake, Lake <br />occurrence <br />Crook and numerous <br />other spill ways and <br />damns <br />Earthquake <br />3 Since 2010 <br />Unlikely <br />Random Throughout <br />County <br />Expansive Soils <br />Limited Data <br />Likely <br />Random Throughout <br />County <br />Terrorism <br />Limited Data <br />Likely <br />Critical Facilities, VA <br />Hospital, & <br />Correctional Facilities <br />Hazardous Materials <br />Limited Data <br />Likely <br />Along all major <br />thorough fairs, and <br />multiple <br />manufacturing <br />locations located <br />throughout the county <br />Other Hazards <br />No record of previous <br />Unlikely <br />Not probable (Priority <br />(Hurricanes, <br />occurerences or <br />Rating Index <1 )* <br />Mudslides, <br />evidence of future risk <br />Radiological <br />Emergencies ect.) <br />3.2 HAZARD ASSESSMENTS <br />The Hazard Profiles, found in following sections, were prepared for each identified natural hazard <br />and assess the hazard per the following eight categories. <br />1. Description: Identification and description of hazards likely to affect the multi - <br />jurisdictional area along with the sources used to identify these hazards. <br />2. Location: The location or geographic area affected by each natural hazard along <br />with a map of the areas affected. <br />3. Extent: Extent describes the hazard's impact in terms of potential severity of impact <br />that the hazard event is capable of inflicting upon the county and sixteen <br />jurisdictions. Classification methods such as the Fujita Scale and Richter Scales are <br />used to illustrate extent. Due to the limited amount of county and city specific <br />documented data, the analysis for determining potential severity was limited to <br />50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.