03/08/2017 MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

place look really bad and are in disrepair. Commissioner Dux explained that the Design Standards had a lot of information on replacement windows and he also would be willing to share with him some information on the windows he has researched. Motion to deny the application by Commissioner Alarid, motion seconded by Commissioner Barbee Motion carried 7 — 0 B. COA #2017 -10 Fagade Restoration, 112 Bonham ST, David Alarid a motion was made to recuse Commissioner Alarid by Sarah Barbee, seconded by Commissioner Knox motion carried 6 — 0. Mr. Alarid explained he is interested in restoring the original store front of what is known as the Varner Building. Although the historic photos were difficult to decipher what the original storefront looked like, Mr. Alarid presented 4 designs renderings he had received from the Texas Main Street program. The commission reviewed the four options and it was decided after discussion all the options that the options #4 would be the most appropriate based on the time period and building style. This option included a display window, door and display window. This is much like the building located just west of the Varner building. A motion was made to approve Mr. Alarids fagade rendering #4 with the condition that he used appropriate materials by Commissioner Knox, seconded by Commissioner Barbee, motion carried 6 — 0. A motion was made to bring Commissioner Alarid back into the commission, Motion carried 6 - 0 C. COA #2017 -11 Installation of new windows, 134 SW I" ST, Chris Dux. A motion was made to recuse Commissioner Dux by Sarah Barbee, seconded by Commissioner Knox. Motions carried. Mr. Dux explained that when he purchased the building there weren't any windows in the building only the upright dividers. These pieces displayed what the original configuration of windows was present at the time of the building constructions. Additional researched proved that the windows are exactly like the windows left next door building to the North. He further noted on the front the window opening would hold three windows, the south facing openings two. Dux brought a sample of the window that he was intending to use. The window consisted of powder coated aluminum clad wooden windows as allowed in the Design standards. Commissioner Barbee called for any other questions. Hearing none, a motion was made to approve the windows as presented by Commissioner Knox, seconded by Commissioner Rolen. Motion carried 6 -0. A motion was made to bring Commissioner back into the commission. Motion carried 6 - 0 D. Consent Agenda items: Discussion and possible action regarding the following structures considered by code inspectors to be in violation of Article III of Chapter 7 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Paris, Paris, Texas, entitled "Substandard and Dangerous Buildings and Structures," to determine whether such buildings or structures can be rehabilitated and designated on the National Register of Historic Places, as a recorded Texas Historic Landmark, or as historic property as designated by the City Council of the City of Paris. Commissioner Steely requested Item B 424 Graham St be pulled from the consent agenda for discussion, and send items A. 737 NW 10 ST, C.1232 W. Cherry, D. 1214 W. Kaufinan, E. 634