My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05 - MINUTES OF JULY 24, 2017 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2017
>
08 - AUGUST
>
08/14/2017
>
05 - MINUTES OF JULY 24, 2017 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 9:15:35 AM
Creation date
8/11/2017 8:08:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Council Meeting <br />July 24, 2017 <br />Page 7 <br />Council Member Jenkins said jobs were needed in Paris, he supported PEDC but at this <br />time he thought that maybe they did need to do something different. <br />Council Member Lancaster said she could not and would not take the right of citizens to <br />vote on the direction the City is taking. She said it was important and the citizens were the ones <br />they needed to listen to. Council Member Lancaster said she was in favor of the vote. <br />Council Member Trenado said he was also in favor of the vote. He inquired of City <br />Attorney Stephanie Harris if they could divide equally between economic development and <br />streets the way the ballot was worded now. Ms. Harris said it depended on, what kind of <br />economic development they wanted to do, but not as written. She said the only economic <br />development tax that was allowed under the law was a Type A and Type B. If they want to <br />divide the money differently, they would have to word the ordinance differently. Trenado asked <br />if the way it was worded now would require the funds to go to streets. Ms. Harris answered in <br />the affirmative. Mayor Clifford said if citizens approve the proposition on the l #l, p py p, uld <br />pass a rtsb�r Lion redirectin 'the `$600.000 currentt� used for stree m�, matenals`:tc�' eoortoti�iic <br />development -d the endiesult would be the same r. Godwin k's, d if the voters approved the <br />proposition that ,� would hive to be meted on every fd years. <br />Council l4ember .Knox said this has go on very convoluted very fast. While she liked <br />the; idea about 384 n lieu. of,,s they also i Bided t© o the streets, but she said she was not in <br />r� <br />favor of abandoning economie i�velopment.e said sloe thought ,tlie3� "iced to table this for a <br />little more investigation and discussion. <br />Council,;IVi ember Portugal commenced the mayor for bring this to the Council. She <br />favored tablmg phis to get answers hpqause the said they did not J&ow what a chapter 380 was. <br />She`sad this was thrown at them without a workshop or Council retreat so they could talk about <br />their vision for economic development: <br />A Motion to accept the ballot language with the understanding that the City Council is <br />planning to instruct the City Manager to divert the $600,000 from streets into a fund that would <br />fund economic development through Chapter 380, if the proposition is approved by the voters <br />was made by Mayor Clifford and seconded by Council Member Lancaster. Council Member <br />Drake confirmed that the instructions to divert the $600,000 would only happen if the <br />proposition passed. Mayor Clifford confirmed that and said if the proposition fails, then nothing <br />would change. Council Member Knox said either way, the citizens would get to vote whether or <br />not they have economic development to the tune of $600,000 or $1.2 Million Dollars. Mayor <br />Clifford said that was correct. <br />Mayor Clifford called for a vote on the Motion. Motion carried, 6 ayes - 1 nay, with <br />Council Member Portugal casting the dissenting vote. <br />14. Discuss and authorize execution of a professional services agreement with Grantham & <br />Associates to provide engineering design and related professional services for the Church <br />Street Reconstruction Project, in an amount not to exceed $200,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.