Laserfiche WebLink
Motion was made by Charles Richards, seconded by Sally McEwin to accept <br />Robert's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. 7 -0 <br />4. Code Enforcement update. <br />4 structures demoed. All moved up. Also moved up 1 more. <br />Annual demo budget was $100,000. To date we've spent $91,273, leaving $8,727 until <br />end of fiscal year, end of September. <br />Q - Do we have an idea what it would cost to clean up rubbish on 2 properties presented <br />here? <br />A - A little less than a demo, depending on if we send city employees or have a <br />contractor do it that charges by tonnage. <br />Q - Does clean-up of junk and rubbish come out of demo budget? <br />A - Yes. When the current budget was set, we did not have the ordinance for junk and <br />rubbish. <br />Q - What does abatement cost come out oV <br />A - Demo budget. We have house demo and sanitation fees in that budget. $60,000 in <br />demo and $40,000 in sanitation, which also covers abatement crew taking trash to the <br />dump. <br />Q - Status of West Sherman? <br />A - Nothing has been done. Orders expire end of this month. That will be a large <br />expense, so I'll have to get funds allocated by City Manager. We will salvage what we <br />can to recoup some of the expense. <br />Q - Culverts? <br />A - Have been sold. <br />Q - Do we need to ask City Council for more funding? <br />A - That will be up to the City Manager. But acquiring more funding has not been an <br />issue in the past. Demo and clean-up has always been a top priority with the council. <br />Q - Status of Mr. Preston's property presented last month? <br />A - There is progress being made. <br />5. Future agenda items. <br />Re -elect officers next 1 -2 months. <br />6. Adjournment. <br />Motion was made by Ben Vaughan, seconded by Charles Richards to adjourn the <br />meeting at 4:14 pm. Motion carried unanimously. 7 -0 <br />APPROVED THIS 21 st DAY OF AUGUST, 2017. 0- ., W, <br />10W0/ <br />-CliairmqA <br />