Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 14 <br />memorandum <br />TO: Mayor & City Council <br />FROM: John Godwin, City Manager <br />SUBJECT: RAISES FOR RETIREES <br />DATE: August 21, 2017 <br />BACKGROUND: We all agree this is a very important issue for a number of our former <br />employees. For those who retired a number of years ago, raises after retirement were apparently <br />common, so those retirees became accustomed to receiving them, which I fully understand. <br />Also, at one time TMRS was financially much healthier than it is today, and often issued a <br />"thirteenth" check each year to its retired members from surplus funds, so members got used to <br />that too. However, over time, and in the face of so many retirement systems across the country <br />going broke, TMRS realized it needed to change its actuarial basis to ensure it would be <br />financially sound for years to come. Part of that was increasing contributions from member <br />cities, including Paris, to ensure actuarial soundness. <br />The good news is that TMRS is now a high quality, financially sound retirement system. <br />Employees contribute 6% of their pay and the city doubles that amount. Participants can retire in <br />as little as twenty years. I believe anywhere in Texas that is a good system, and I think many <br />people in Paris would be quite happy to be able to participate in such a plan. In addition, a <br />unique benefit offered to retired city employees under 65 years of age is a continuing health <br />insurance plan for which we pay $6,000 per year per retiree. The city has 104 current employees <br />potentially eligible for this benefit. We budget $125,000 to pay for it. <br />The ad hoc retiree COLA being considered only benefits those who have been retired for over a <br />year. No current employee would benefit from the ad hoc raise when they retire in the future, so <br />such a move would not help current employees, or help us in recruiting. Current employees <br />would only benefit if the city adopted an annually repeating COLA option, which I think we all <br />agree is simply too expensive (and would require a significant tax rate increase). As to <br />guarantees made to former employees, I have been told by Finance Director Gene Anderson <br />there were no guarantees made to employees about future raises. Certainly a city council cannot <br />legally obligate a future council in that way; every budget stands on its own. <br />