My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
>
1972-2016
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 3:43:09 PM
Creation date
11/30/2017 3:43:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />- -_....._ "L. <br />GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORTS- . <br />PAYING THEIR WAY <br />To prove the point that general aviation airports <br />provide economic benefits, consider the findings of two <br />new studies. In one, the FAA acknowledges that a <br />typical general aviation airport with 100 based aircraft <br />and no commercial service saves time and reduce's-- <br />travel costs of those who use that airport over the next <br />best transportation alternative. In dollar terms, that <br />transportation benefit alone is estimated by the FAA <br />to be more than $1 million annually. <br />As another means of comparison, consider another <br />study, a recent and comprehensive analysis of airport <br />economic benefit —good old dollar benefit to a commu- <br />nity. This particular study was completed by an <br />independent, international consulting firm for the <br />Commonwealth of Virginia. <br />There are 80 public -use airports in Virginia; fewer <br />than the national average of 110 per state. Admittedly, <br />Virginia has two international airports, but the number <br />of active aircraft in the state is only slightly less than <br />the national average as are the estimated hours flown <br />in the Commonwealth. Therefore, it's fair to compare <br />Virginia's airports and its diverse economy with those <br />of other states. <br />The study clearly shows that "VirginWs-80 public - <br />use airports allow the State's ,business community to <br />participate in national and international markets; and <br />public and - private funds invested irr.the Common- <br />wealth's airports annually produce economic returns <br />which far exceed the amounts -spent to operate and <br />maintain those facilities." <br />The basis of this information was the U.S. Depart- <br />ment of Commerce's Regional Input - Output Modeling <br />System (RIMS II) whichadmittedly does not encom- <br />pass ALL economic benefits. The study also used <br />very conservative dollar multiplier of 2.8. Many <br />experts believe that a multiplier of 4 or even 5 is <br />realistic. <br />The Virginia study also concludes that: <br />• Each dollar spent by aviation and/or aviation =de- <br />pendent businesses generates an additional $1.52 <br />in economic activity; <br />• Airport jobs are desirable, and the average <br />airport wage was 40 percent higher than the <br />average Virginia salary; <br />• For every job at the airport, nearly three are <br />created in the visitor - related economy; <br />• Aviation - related businesses and their employees <br />annually contribute $105 million in local taxes; <br />• Aviation facilities attract new_ industry,totthe <br />Commonwealth; and, <br />• Many visitors arriving by air spend:about $70 per <br />day in this geographical area. <br />The consultants also made an astounding announce- <br />ment concerning the expenditure of over $28 million <br />spent on airport capital improveqnts. "Airport <br />construction projects are particularly beneficial be- <br />cause dollars spent by state•and local governments are <br />highly leveraged with federal and private funds. The <br />multiplier effects of construction spending are espe= <br />cially strong because each dollar spent on construction <br />generates an additional $2 in economic activity. To- <br />gether, these two factors mean that airport - develop- <br />ment projects produce an impact on the State's econ- <br />omy that is more than25 times the amount contributed <br />-by State and local funds." <br />One of the most important aspects of the study was <br />that of general aviation's impact. Of course, the eco- <br />nomic impacts associated with general aviation air- <br />ports varied. The busiest, Leesburg, generates nearly <br />$28 million per year in economic activity. But, even <br />the smallest general aviation airports contribute more <br />than $100;00 annually to the economy. The point is <br />that Virginia's average general aviation airport has <br />only 23 based aircraft but contributes $1.6 million per <br />year in economic activity, most of which is spent <br />locally.--Total payroll - attributable to the average -- <br />general aviation airport is- over-$400,000. <br />Interestingly, even airports with less than 10,000 <br />operations a year produced economic impact exceeding <br />the amount of money necessary to operate and main- <br />tain the facility. <br />Enough of the facts and figures! What can be <br />learned from this information? It is clear -that if <br />Virginia's general aviation airports generate these <br />significant economic benefits, it can reasonably be <br />assumedthat similar airports across the country —and <br />in your community —do the same. <br />Local general aviation airports produce identifiable <br />economicbenefits over and above the tax dollars spent <br />on operating and maintaining the facilities, and over <br />the intangible benefits inherent with access to the <br />nation's air transportation system. <br />Communities should try to understand the value of <br />their own airports by embarking on an economic <br />analysis. Without that information, the airport is <br />vulnerable to those who criticize the airport for nui- <br />3 -1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.