My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-2004
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2016
>
2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2015 12:24:05 PM
Creation date
2/9/2018 2:12:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 25, 2004 <br />Page 3 <br />R. 1123 S. Main <br />Motion to forward all structures to the Building and Standards Commission <br />for action was made by Barbara Wilson, seconded by Sue Lancaster. Motion <br />carried 6 -0. <br />5. Discussion of and possible action on directions to ArchiTexas on Design <br />Guidelines for the Downtown Historic District. Chairman Starrett advised the <br />Commission that ArchiTexas said they would be at the regular November <br />meeting with design guidelines 95% completed. He stated he felt the <br />Commission should have a workshop to go through the guidelines line by <br />line. The Commission agreed to have a meeting on Saturday, November 6 at <br />10:00 a.m. in the City Hall Annex. <br />6. Discussion of and possible action on establishing an application fee for <br />Certificates of Appropriateness. The Commission members agreed that they <br />did not feel the City should impose a fee at this time. Mrs. Wilson stated she <br />would prefer that the City increase revenue by enforcing the violations and <br />increasing fine collections rather than penalizing those who are trying to <br />follow the law. Motion that no fee for COAs be implemented at this time was <br />made by Brian Wear, seconded by Jerry Raper. Motion carried 6 -0. The <br />Commission asked that the City Council be made aware of the reasons why <br />they do not recommend a fee. <br />7. Receipt ofreport from the Historic Preservation Officer. The HPO advised that <br />she did not have a report at this time. The Commission requested that Mr. <br />O'Brien be required to replace the plate glass window, and Ms. Wright stated <br />she would contact him. She said that Mr. O'Brien has been cooperative with <br />regard to cleaning up the station, so she hoped he would continue to do that <br />and voluntarily replace the window. Chairman Starrett asked that the HPO <br />create an action point list to present to the Commission monthly that will <br />show when a question came up at a meeting or when a question came to the <br />HPO and what action was taken with regard to the question and when. He <br />stated this will help the Commission stay aware of where projects stand in the <br />event someone asks them. <br />8. Request items from Board for future agendas. There were none. <br />9. The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.