Laserfiche WebLink
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION <br />MID-TEX DON <br />ALL CITIES IN THE MID-TEX DIVISION AS IDENTIFIED IN EXHIBIT A TO <br />THIS RATE SCHEDULE <br />. ....... . ........................ . <br />1E DATE. �Bffls Rendered on, and after 04/011�/2018 PAGE' 4 <br />A, sworn statement shall be filed by an Officer of the Company affirming that the filed <br />schedules are in compliance with the, provisions of this Rate Review Mechanism and <br />are true and correct to the best of hi's/her knowledge, information, and belief.No <br />testimony shall be filed, but a brief narrative explanation shall be provided of any <br />changes to, corporate structure, accounting, methodologies, allocation of common costs, <br />or atypical or non- recurring items included in the filing. <br />VL Evaluation Procedures <br />The regulatory authority having original jurisdiction over the Company's rate's !shall <br />review and render a decision on the Company's proposed rate adjustment prior to the <br />Effective Date. The Company shall provide all supplemental information requested to <br />ensure an opportunity for adequate review by the relevant regulatory authority, The <br />Company shall' not unilaterally impose any limits upon, the provision of supplemental <br />information, and such information shall be provided within seven (7) working days of the <br />original request. The regulatory authority may propose any adjustments it determines to <br />be required to bring the proposed rate adjustment into compliance with the provisions of <br />thus tariff. <br />The regulatory authority may disallow any net plant investment that is not shown to be <br />prudently incurred. Approval by the regulatory authority of net plant investment plursuant <br />to the provisions of this, tariff shall constitute a finding that such net plant investment <br />was prudently incurred. Such finding of prudence shall not be subject to further review <br />in, a subsequent RRM or Statement of Intent filing. <br />During the Review Period, the Company and the regulatory authority will work <br />collaboratively and seek agreement on the level of rate adjustments. If, at the end of the <br />Review Period, the Company and the regulatory authority have not reached agreement, <br />the regulatory authority shall take action to modify or deny the proposed rate <br />adjustments. The Company shall have the right to appeal the regulatory authority's <br />action to the Railroad Commission of Texas. Upon the filing of an appeal of the <br />regulatory authority's order relating to an annual RRM filing with the Railroad <br />Commission of Texas, the regulatory authority Ihaving original jurisdiction over the <br />Company"s rates shall not oppose the implementation of the Company's proposed rates <br />subject to refund, nor will the regulatory authority advocate for the imposition of a third <br />party surety bond by the Company. Any refund shall be limited to and determined based <br />on the resolution of the disputed adjustments) in a final, non -appealable order issued in <br />the appeal filed by the Company at the Railroad Commission of Texas, <br />