Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting <br />March 25, 2019 <br />Page 4 <br />15. Discuss and act on an airport management contract and a flight based operator (FB) <br />agreement at Cox Field. <br />Mr. Godwin explained that the FBO and management agreements were both currently <br />with J.R. Aviation, and one had expired and the other was soon expiring. Mr. Godwin further <br />explained that the city staff and airport board had been addressing these agreements over the last <br />few months, had looked at different options, and were recommending that the two new proposed <br />agreements be approved. Mr. Godwin said the recommendation was for a term of five years for <br />each agreement, which included an increase of net revenues from fuel sales by approximately <br />$6,000 annually. Council discussed the possibility of one combined agreement, making the <br />agreement for one year and putting this out for bid. J.R. Aviation owner Jerry Richey said they <br />had been at Cox Field for thirty-one years and had never had any issues. He also said he planned <br />to retire in five years and one year did not do him a lot of good. Co -manager Brandi Ebbs <br />explained that if another FBO wanted to come in, they could do so but would have to put in their <br />own fuel tanks. Mayor Clifford and Council Member Knox favored a one-year term, allowing <br />for the bidding process. Based on J.R. Aviation's tenure of thirty-one years, Council Member <br />Pilgrim supported the five-year contract, as did Council Member Hughes and Council Member <br />Portugal. <br />A motion to award the contracts to J.R. Aviation was made by Council Member Hughes <br />and seconded by Council Member Stone. Motion carried, 5 ayes — 2 nays, with Mayor Clifford <br />and Council Member Knox casting the dissenting votes. <br />16. Discuss and act on amendments and enforcement of Hangar Leases at Cox Field. <br />Mr. Godwin said the airport advisory board recommended changes to the standard city - <br />owned hangar leases and updated lease rates for most hangars. He explained that the board <br />wanted to remove persons without leases with the city, update all old leases to the new standard <br />lease agreement, and require all leases with the city to be fully enforced or face revocation. Mr. <br />Godwin said if there was no activity in a hangar for 180 days, the lease would be terminated. <br />They also added in a Lamar County resident preference with the current lease holders being <br />grandfathered. Mr. Godwin gave an example of current lease holders with old leases, such as <br />those executed in 1994, would be required to execute a new lease and pay the rent pursuant to <br />the new rates. Council Member Knox wanted to know if all of the hangars were owned by the <br />city and Mr. Godwin said they were not. He said there were hangars that people built and leased <br />ground space from the city for forty years. Council Member Knox inquired about people living <br />in hangars. Mr. Godwin said he knew of one and many years ago a former staff member issued a <br />permit allowing an apartment to be built in that privately owned hangar. Mayor Clifford <br />inquired about the waiting list for city -owned hangars and Council Member Portugal said there <br />were eighteen people on the waiting list. Mayor Clifford said he was opposed to limiting <br />hangars to Lamar County residents only. Council Member Portugal said if the city did not open <br />rentals up for everyone, it would look like Paris was closed for business. Council Member <br />Pilgrim inquired about the effect on people who had offices in their hangars. Mr. Godwin said <br />these amendments would not have an effect on the two currently at the airport, because they <br />were running aeronautical type businesses. <br />