Laserfiche WebLink
In general, no. If capital improvement projects are not necessary expenditures incurred due to the <br />COVID-19 public health emergency, then Fund payments may not be used for such projects. <br />However, Fund payments may be used for the expenses of, for example, establishing temporary public <br />medical facilities and other measures to increase COVID-19 treatment capacity or improve mitigation <br />measures, including related construction costs. <br />The Guidance includes workforce bonuses as an example of ineligible expenses but provides that <br />hazard pay would be eligible if otherwise determined to be a necessary expense. Is there a specific <br />definition of "hazard pay"? <br />Hazard pay means additional pay for performing hazardous duty or work involving physical hardship, in <br />each case that is related to COVID-19. <br />The Guidance provides that ineligible expenditures include "[p]ayroll or benefits expenses for <br />employees whose work duties are not substantially dedicated to mitigating or responding to the <br />C011ID-19 public health emergency. " Is this intended to relate only to public employees? <br />Yes. This particular nonexclusive example of an ineligible expenditure relates to public employees. A <br />recipient would not be permitted to pay for payroll or benefit expenses of private employees and any <br />financial assistance (such as grants or short-term loans) to private employers are not subject to the <br />restriction that the private employers' employees must be substantially dedicated to mitigating or <br />responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency. <br />May counties pre pay with CARES Act funds for expenses such as a one or two year facility lease, <br />such as to house staff hired in response to COVID-19? <br />A government should not make prepayments on contracts using payments from the Fund to the extent that <br />doing so would not be consistent with its ordinary course policies and procedures. <br />Questions Related to Administration of Fund Payments <br />Do governments have to return unspent funds to Treasury? <br />Yes. Section 601(f)(2) of the Social Security Act, as added by section 5001(a) of the CARES Act, <br />provides for recoupment by the Department of the Treasury of amounts received from the Fund that have <br />not been used in a manner consistent with section 601(d) of the Social Security Act. If a government has <br />not used funds it has received to cover costs that were incurred by December 30, 2020, as required by the <br />statute, those funds must be returned to the Department of the Treasury. <br />What records must be kept by governments receiving payment? <br />A government should keep records sufficient to demonstrate that the amount of Fund payments to the <br />government has been used in accordance with section 601(d) of the Social Security Act <br />May recipients deposit Fund payments into interest bearing accounts? <br />Yes, provided that if recipients separately invest amounts received from the Fund, they must use the <br />interest earned or other proceeds of these investments only to cover expenditures incurred in accordance <br />with section 601(d) of the Social Security Act and the Guidance on eligible expenses. If a government <br />deposits Fund payments in a government's general account, it may use those funds to meet immediate <br />cash management needs provided that the full amount of the payment is used to cover necessary <br />