Laserfiche WebLink
b. Benchmark Job Selection will be made by identifying City job classes common to its employment - <br />competitive public and private employers in the immediate area and throughout the region or State, <br />clearly identifiable, and representative of standard occupational job groups. <br />c. Comparator Employers Identification will be made in consultation with the City's Project <br />Manager(s). Criteria include their degree of competition to the City in obtaining and retaining high <br />quality staff, their location in the City's traditional recruitment areas, and their organizational size and <br />complexity. <br />d. Compensation Data Collection will be made by one or more of the following methods. <br />Pre -survey contact with the selected comparator employers to solicit participation in the City's <br />compensation survey(s) <br />Extraction from the pay plans of designated public employers. <br />Customized salary survey requests for local governments and other public employers, distributed <br />by mail, fax, and e-mail. <br />As desired, additional data extraction from established salary surveys and commercial survey <br />sources such as Watson Wyatt, ERI, AWWA, etc. <br />e. Data Quality Control includes editing data for accuracy and proper matching to the City's survey <br />benchmark jobs, and phone/fax/E-mail follow-ups for data clarification and to obtain comparators' <br />benchmark job descriptions. <br />3. efteyvailing Rates Calculation <br />We will consolidate the compensation data from all sources, enter the information into the EZ COMPTM <br />program, and compute the prevailing rates, inclusive of cost of living differentials, as the statistical mean <br />of the survey data for each benchmark job class. Data will be projected forward from the date of collection <br />to a common date relating to the City's salary plan year by the annual Prevailing Rate Increase Factor <br />(PRI) applicable at that time. <br />4. Compensation Competitiveness Comparison <br />We will provide the City with charts comparing its current salary structures to those of the selected public <br />and private comparator employers. We will calculate the extent that the City's offerings vary from the <br />prevailing rates and practices of other relevant employers. <br />5. Compensation Competitiveness Polic <br />We will assist the City to select a compensation competitiveness policy which best fits its compensation <br />strategy and financial resources, by providing fiscal impact estimates at various percentage relationships <br />to the prevailing rates. <br />6. Salary Plan Structure Uodatin <br />We will 1) prepare updates to the City's current wage plan structures or 2) prepare alternative salary range <br />structures and schedules for the City to select the best fit for its competitiveness strategy, with these <br />optional criteria: <br />- Method of administration, i.e.: measured job performance, longevity, or skill <br />- Width of the salary ranges, grades, or broad bands, from Minimum to Maximum <br />- If steps within the salary ranges, number of steps, percentage separation <br />- Number of salary ranges, grades, or broad bands in the salary schedule <br />CPTX PUBLIC SECTOR PERSONNEL CONSULTANTS 12/20 <br />