My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-077-RES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris, did in Resolution No. 88-065 on July 11, 1988, authorize
City-of-Paris
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
1889-2010
>
1930-1999
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
1988-077-RES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Paris, did in Resolution No. 88-065 on July 11, 1988, authorize
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2006 4:34:14 PM
Creation date
4/15/2005 1:55:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
1988
Doc Type
Resolution
CITY CLERK - Date
8/8/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />Publish - The Paris News <br />July 20, 1988 <br />July 21, 19~' :,J <br />Ju ly 22, 1988'....' " "~ . <br /> <br />LEGAL NOTICE <br /> <br />The City of Paris will received proposals for Professional Consultants <br />to develop a Food Processing Plant feasibility study. The work items <br />will include, but not be limited to, the following: <br /> <br />1. Determine the crops that are being produced in the area at <br />present that would be suitable for processing and identify the <br />processed food product lines ( fresh, canned, frozen, dry, etc.) <br />that will be most cost-effective and produce for the greatest <br />return, as well as market capacity and feasibility for the types <br />of foods identified. <br /> <br />2. Identify those producers who would be willing to participate in a <br />vertically integrated, producer-controlled, food processing plant. <br /> <br />3. Determine the products that can be compatibly produced in a <br />single facility. <br /> <br />4. Determine how much initial funding a co-op might generate, and <br />who is willing to pledge that funding. <br /> <br />5. Determine the appropriate size and arrangement necessary for the <br />facility to allow maximum production. <br /> <br />6. Determine the feasibility of adaptive re-use of available <br />properties as to function and as to ability to comply with the <br />Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, if <br />necessary, and an estimate of the costs involved. <br /> <br />6.a ENVIRONMENTAL ADDENOUM: (Due at Midpoint of the study. Prepare <br />an environmental analysis and comparison of the proposed sites. <br />Include the following: the impact on existing utilities and <br />infrastructure (especially the current availabil ity, supply, and <br />capacity of the water and waste water facilities), traffic, 100 <br />year flood plains, and historic and/or archeological resources. <br /> <br />7. Identify additional resources and sources of funding that are <br />available for capital expenditures, operational assistance, and <br />product marketing. <br /> <br />8. Determine the approximate number and kinds of jobs that will be <br />created as a result; in the field (on the farm), in the plant, <br />for transportation and shipping, and in management and marketing. <br /> <br />9. Determine the capital investment that will be required at each <br />phase, including building acquisition, building restoration or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.