Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 22 <br />TO: City Council <br />Grayson Path, City Manager <br />FROM: Andrew Mack, Director, Community Development <br />Stephanie H. Harris, City Attorney <br />SUBJECT: Disannexation Request -660 and 680 CR 32900 (LOAD Parcels 50055 and <br />50056) <br />DATE: May 24, 2021 <br />BACKGROUND: The City has received an application for disannexation by Brandon and Kara <br />Bond for the parcels set forth above. <br />The application requests that the City Council consider disannexing their property located at 660 <br />and 680 CR 32400 (LCAD Parcels 50055 and 50056—see attached maps for location of the <br />property) for the following reasons, which boil down primarily to a lack of provision of city <br />services: <br />Property owners are required to pay city taxes but receive no city utilities. Property is on <br />county water and septic. Property is located on a county road that is not maintenanced by <br />the city. Furthermore property owners are required to pay city trash fees but are not <br />provided with trash pickup. Nothing about said property is maintenanced or provided for <br />by the City of Paris. <br />STATUS OF ISSUE: The only services not currently available to to the property are water and <br />sewer, and there are no plans at this time to extend water and sewer to this area. Water service <br />provided by the Lamar County Water Supply District is available. Bear in mind that "services" <br />include trash collection, which is a rate paying service, and police and fire coverage. Regardless, <br />the property does not meet the City's criteria for considering disannexation (see Policies and <br />Procedures at page 16, attached hereto 16) because (a) this is a request by a single property owner <br />for two contiguous parcels; and (b) disannexation of the property would create a keyhole within <br />the City limits.' <br />' "The City will consider disannexation of any area within its corporate limits if so requested by a majority of the <br />property owner(s) .... and if The proposed disannexation is part of an identifiable, logical whole (versus individual <br />parcels) which neither creates `holes" inside the existing corporate limits, nor forces any other area of the city outside <br />the revised city limit boundary line (`islands' outside the revised lines)." Policies and Procedures p. 16. [Italics added.] <br />