Laserfiche WebLink
this property and are willing for it to go up for auction. The current owners apparently do not <br />live in Paris and have allegedly told Ms. Thomas that they will sell her the property so long as <br />they have no expense for conducting the transaction. Ms. Thomas would like to purchase the <br />property, extend her fence around it, but more importantly start maintaining the property both in <br />terms of codes and taxes. <br />The property is vacant and approximately 60' wide by 80' deep which is smaller than a typical <br />buildable lot (a variance would be needed to build on it). It is zoned 2F (Two Family Dwelling). <br />Pursuant to City Code 4.03.009, only the City Council can consider waiving a Structure Lien (the <br />November 16, 2009 lien). Under City Code 7.04.011, the City Manager can consider waiving <br />Nuisance Liens (the six remaining liens). <br />STATUS OF ISSUE: <br />The City Manager has developed a process he goes through for considering when to forgive <br />principal and/or interest for Nuisance Liens. It is not perfect, but this procedure allows him to <br />remain fairly consistent each time. Given there are so many different factors and scenarios <br />involved with properties all over town, the City Manager attempts to adhere to two goals: <br />1. Protect the taxpayer dollar — resist forgiving liens whenever possible given taxpayers had <br />expense in maintaining the property, while <br />2. Finding a way to get the property in to the hands of someone who will maintain — possibly <br />develop — the property, thus alleviating the taxpayers of having to further maintain the <br />property. <br />Taking in to consideration both goals, the City Manager's analysis in this situation is as follows: <br />the value of the liens and property taxes greatly exceed the value of the property and historically <br />the current owners have clearly refused to pay taxes and maintain the property. Therefore, it is <br />reasonable to assume that the current owners will continue to not pay taxes or maintain the <br />property, thus the taxpayers will continue to have expenses. This would inevitably lead to a tax <br />sale in which case the City will most likely not recoup enough to cover both the owed taxes and <br />the liens. In addition, the property does not meet necessary lot size for building a home (this can <br />be overcome if someone wished to pursue it through the process). <br />Ms. Thomas and the current owners have worked together, using a local title company, and agreed <br />to sell the property for a deminimus amount and Ms. Thomas will pay all transaction expenses <br />including owed property taxes. Ms. Thomas wishes for this property to not go up for tax sale as <br />