Laserfiche WebLink
From these calculations, we can see the added cost annually to have to travel to other landfills. <br />This is completely separate from the landfill dumping fee. What this cannot show you is the <br />eventual cost to replace trucks due to added wear and tear as well as the incredible burden it will <br />place on staff needing to work longer hours. Once again, if we had a Transfer Station, this would <br />be a much different conversation, but that is not an option today. <br />Even if competitive bidding could somehow give us a better price than 20% below the average of <br />the five listed landfills, and as discussed, that is doubtful, it would be incredibly difficult to account <br />for the impact to staff and equipment. That will be discussed further below. <br />Cost SummarAgalysis: <br />When examining this situation, we must consider the added cost for landfill fees as well as the <br />added cost for operational services. One does not impact the other but they both impact the same <br />budget. <br />The City has budgeted $184,000.00 under line item 45-0317-44-00 for landfill fees. We have <br />spent approximately $160,000.00 many of the last few years, although FY20/21 is showing signs <br />of surpassing this and being closer to the budgeted amount of $184,000.00. A 46% increase in <br />tonnage fees pursuant to the Waste Connection renewal would add approximately $85,000.00 to <br />our budget. The overall Sanitation budget is approximately $1.1 million, thus this is about 8% <br />more than budgeted. The City collects an additional $300,000.00 in revenue, but this is applied <br />towards the General Fund for related expenses (ex: road repairs, billing expenses, etc.; overall a <br />property tax subsidy). <br />Setting aside the landfill tonnage fee, let's look at the operational cost. To go to the next nearest <br />landfill (Antlers, OK) would add an additional $130k to the budget before we even consider <br />tonnage fees. Therefore, we have to perform a cost benefit analysis when it comes to procurement. <br />Looking at Antlers, OK — in order to make a switch from the Blossom Landfill to the Antlers <br />Landfill make sense, we would need a new tonnage fee that, when added to the new operational <br />cost to haul the trash further, brings the new added cost to the budget to something less than <br />$85,000.00. When you perform the calculation, we would need to receive a tonnage price of <br />$15/ton or less. Given the average price of the other five landfills is $36.89/ton and the Waste <br />Connection renewal is for $29.51/ton, we have every reason to believe that bids (including Waste <br />Connection) will come in much higher. In addition, we went ahead and contacted the Antlers, OK <br />landfill and they charge $45.00/ton. We contacted the Mt. Pleasant landfill and they charge <br />$37.00/ton. They might negotiate that for the volume we would produce, but the point is clear — <br />any landfill we select, we would need an unrealistic drop in our current rate to overcome the added <br />cost for hauling trash further out than the Blossom landfill. In addition, there is question as to <br />