My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2464 Clark Lane - Variance Granted for 10ft for Lot Width Requirement
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
DECISIONS
>
2464 Clark Lane - Variance Granted for 10ft for Lot Width Requirement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2021 8:13:39 AM
Creation date
10/6/2021 8:13:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF PARIS, TEXAS <br />RE: Variance Request <br />Jaxon Rader <br />OBO Doreen Ruthart <br />2464 Clark Lane <br />Paris, TX 75460 <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Variance of 1Oft for lot width requirement <br />The <br />Pariabove-reference <br />e-ref r Board of request <br />wa (grante) / denied / granted in part and denied in by the City <br />�1� <br />e <br />the application and .. L , against the application with <br />by a abstaining. in favor of <br />Zoning nt Board on 10/OS _ <br />.................... � On this date, the <br />Board found that the request met the conditions set forth in Section 9-201 of the City of Paris <br />Zoning Ordinance. <br />Appeal: Any interested person wishing to appeal this Board decision is required to file a petition <br />for Writ of Certiorari in a district court, county court or county court at law within ten (10) days <br />of the date this decision is filed in the Board's office consistent with section 211.011 of the Texas <br />Local Government Code. <br />The Board of Adjustment here by approves the variance request based upon the following findings <br />of fact. <br />Board of Adjustment Recommended Findings of Fact <br />1. Although there are no unique conditions or features of the property which is not generally <br />common to other properties with older platted lots in the city, it is the intent of the city to <br />pursue changing the ordinance to make such variance requirements unnecessary in the future. <br />2. The literal compliance with Sections 9-201 of the Zoning Ordinance would cause unnecessary <br />hardship given the fact that this is an existing lot of record, is substandard in lot width and the <br />proposed single-family dwelling cannot be constructed without a variance. <br />3. The granting of the variance will not violate the spirit or the intent of this article. <br />4. The condition or feature which creates the need for the variance did not result from the property <br />owner's own actions. <br />5. The variance by the applicant is not solely for personal convenience, financial hardship, or <br />other reasons unrelated to the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.