Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br />CITY OF PARIS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br />CITY OF PARIS - CITY HALL <br />COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM <br />PARIS TEXAS <br />TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 7, 2021 <br />12:00 O'CLOCK P.M. <br />The Board ofAdjustment meeting was called to order by Ruth Ann Alsobrook at 12: 00 p. m. <br />The following members were present: Ruth Ann Alsobrook, Chris Fitzgerald, Jerry <br />Haning, William Sanders and Larry Walker. <br />Also present were Andrew Mack, via cell phone, Stephanie Harris and concerned <br />citizens. <br />2. Approval of minutes from previous meeting. (June 1, 2021) <br />Motion was made by Larry Walker, seconded by Jerry Haning to approve minutes for the June 1st, <br />2021 meeting. Motion carried 4:0. <br />3. Public hearing to consider and take action on the petition of Charles Edwards, on behalf <br />of Michele and Ricky Hines on Lot 32, Block 84, of the Hines Addition being located at <br />541 NW 11th Street. <br />The petition requested variances of Section 9-201 Area Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance which <br />provides as follows: <br />(1) 9-201 (1) Schedule minimum lot widths -Residential districts <br />SF -2 Zoning requires a minimum of 60' lot width <br />The applicant is proposing to re -construct a house as part of the HOME Program at 541 NW 11th St. This <br />property does not meet the schedule minimum lot width of 60'. The applicant is requesting a variance of <br />10' to allow the re -construction of a house on a 50' wide lot. <br />Board Member Chris Fitzgerald arrives at 12:02 PM. <br />Andrew Mack, Director of Planning & Community Development, presents the variance to the <br />board explaining that the existing home will be demolished and rebuilt as part of the Home <br />Program. After doing so, Director Mack reminded the board of previous discussion on amending <br />the Ordinance to accommodate sub -standard lots in Paris. Lastly, Director Mack stated that City <br />Staff recommend the variances be approved with no conditions since the existing lot width is 83% <br />of the required lot width and all of the required setbacks can be met and based on the recommended <br />findings of fact listed in the staff memo. <br />