Laserfiche WebLink
in the rear yard without a variance. <br />6. The variance by the applicant is not solely for personal convenience, financial hardship, or <br />other reasons unrelated to the property, but physical convenience with the structure in the <br />proposed location would be favorable to the land owner where requested. <br />7. The proposed use of a new attached carport accessory structure for the single-family <br />dwelling is a permitted addition to the principal residential use of the property in the 2F <br />Zoning District. <br />6. Public hearing to consider and take action on the petition of Audrey Bills, on Lot 10, City <br />Block 74-A, being located at 824 NE Yd Street. <br />The applicant requests a variance of Section 9-601 Area Regulation of the Zoning Ordinance which <br />provides as follows: <br />9-601 (1) Schedule minimum side yards -Residential districts <br />2F Zoning requires a minimum of 5' side yard <br />The applicant is proposing to construct a 20' wide by 22' long carport in the side yard in line with the <br />existing home on the property. The applicant is requesting a 5' variance to allow the proposed carport to be <br />built up to the side property line. <br />Public hearing was declared open. <br />No one else spoke in favor or opposition. <br />Public hearing was declared closed. <br />Motion was made by Larry Walker, seconded by Jerry Haning to approve the variance to Zoning <br />Ordinance, Section 9-601 of the Area Regulations to allow the carport to be constructed up to the <br />side property line based upon the following staff recommended findings of fact. Motion carried <br />5:0. <br />Staff RecommendedFandangs of Fact <br />1. Although there are no unique conditions or features of the property, the house is <br />constructed in the middle of the lot making it impossible to construct a two -car attached <br />carport on the north side of the lot without a variance. <br />2. Substandard building setbacks are prevalent in the surrounding properties of this area. <br />3. The literal compliance with Sections 9-501 & 9-601 of the Zoning Ordinance would cause <br />unnecessary hardship given the fact that dwelling was previously constructed in the <br />middle of the parcel without room for a 2 stall wide carport without a variance. <br />4. The granting of the variance will not violate the spirit or the intent of this article, but it will <br />allow a structure to be permitted adjacent to the neighboring property line. <br />