Laserfiche WebLink
Frey <br />5, The variance by the applicant is not solely for personal convenience, financial hardship, or <br />other reasons unrelated to the property. <br />6. The proposed use of a new single-family dwelling is a permitted use in the SF -2 Zoning <br />District. <br />4. Public hearing to consider and take action on the petition ofChance Floyd, on Lot 1, Blo <br />B, ofthe Meadows, being located at 4135 Jasmine Street. I <br />The applicant requests a variance of Section 9501 Area Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance is <br />provides as follows: <br />(1) 9-501 Schedule minimum front yards -Residential districts <br />ontTar—a,--u-n-�essThe—p7a—[—aZo7signatesadyjere <br />setback <br />TYMT'TM7= -TUXTun ;dpz;fMIr0It_c0nsIrU <br />corner lot a 10' front yard setback is required on the side yard according to the plat. The applicant <br />mistakenly built the fence on the property line instead of at the 10' required setback. The applicant is <br />requesting a 10' variance to leave the fence where it is. <br />Andrew Mack, Director of Planning & Community Development, presents the variance to the <br />board. Andrew states that the fence was measured 10' from the back of the curb, which placed it <br />on the property line versus being measured 10' off the property line. The fence had been permitted <br />Jerry Haning asks since the variance was applied for if the applicant was not willing to do the <br />diagonal instead of going through this process to which Andrew replied that the diagonal was <br />proposed as an option along with the variance process, <br />William Sanders asked with there being other fences in the area identified as non-compliant are <br />