Laserfiche WebLink
6. The plan should seek compact and contiguous political boundaries. Physic <br />boundaries of cultural or economic significance, such as rivers, multi -Ian <br />control access highways or turnpikes, which tend to divide populations <br />fundamental ways, should be recognized and where possible, should on <br />C <br />serve as necessary to achieve recognized objectives. Communities of intere <br />should be retained intact where possible. To the maximum extent possibi - <br />• 4 <br />clearly recognized boundaries, such as streets and highways, should be us <br />to facilitate ease of voter identification of boundaries, as well as electif. <br />administration. <br />7. Where possible, well-recognized and long used election precinct boundaries <br />should be retained intact (within the limitations imposed by state and federal <br />law) or with as little alteration as possible. <br />91. Election precincts in the plan should be sized in conformity with state law. For <br />example, in counties that use traditional, hand counted paper ballots, no <br />election precinct may contain more than 2000 voters. In jurisdictions with <br />voting systems that allow for automated ballot counting, this number may be <br />increased to as many as 5000 registered voters. <br />9. The plan should afford incumbent office holders with the assurance that they <br />will continue to represent the majority of individuals who elected these <br />incumbents, and all incumbents' residential locations should be retained in <br />their reformed precincts to ensure continuity in leadership during the <br />remaining term of incumbents to the extent possible. <br />10, The plan should address fundamental and necessary governmental functions, <br />and to extent possible, ensure that these functions are enhanced rather than <br />impaired. Election administration should not be unduly complex as a result of <br />election boundaries. <br />11. The plan should attempt to locate polling places in convenient, well-known <br />locations that are accessible to disabled voters to the maximum exten'N <br />possible. Public buildings should be utilized to the maximum extent possible <br />as polling places. Where necessary, buildings routinely open to the public, <br />such as churches, retail businesses, or private buildings dedicated to public <br />activities, can be used as polling places. <br />12. If the reduction of polling places can be accomplished, without impinging upon <br />voter convenience and minority voting rights, such reductions can be <br />considered. <br />13. Citizen input should be encouraged, but in order to minimize cost and to have <br />sufficient information to evaluate such proposals fairly, the city will only <br />consider proposed plans submitted to the City for evaluation by individual <br />citizens or groups if the proposed plan is submitted to the City in a commonly <br />used GIS format, such as.SHP,.MAP,.KLM, >GPX,.MDB, along with maps and <br />demographics data sufficient to address voting rights concerns. <br />