My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
18 - Firefighters Relief & Retirement Fund -Pursue a Pension Bond - Freeze Fire Pension - Transfer Employees to TMRS
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
06 - JUNE
>
June 13
>
18 - Firefighters Relief & Retirement Fund -Pursue a Pension Bond - Freeze Fire Pension - Transfer Employees to TMRS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2022 12:45:41 PM
Creation date
6/9/2022 12:43:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
stories from large metropolitan areas that have had to make drastic changes to their benefits due <br />to insurmountable costs to sustain their pension funds. This often has unfortunate consequences <br />for the men and women who worked their entire career for their retirement pension. <br />In December 2020, we learned that there was legislation being considered to amend the TLFFRA <br />to force cities to dramatically increase their contribution amounts to address this growing issue. <br />Such a change would present challenges because other legislation has placed caps on the city's <br />ability to raise funding each year. To our knowledge, the legislation never went anywhere, but it <br />is reasonable to assume that someday the legislature could actually pass this or something similar <br />which will take effect whether we are prepared for it or not. <br />In November 2021, we met with the Board of Trustees to get an update on the Pension. The <br />Pension's actuary had just completed a study to incorporate the substantial pay increases that the <br />Fire Department had been given starting in October 2021 to see if this made an impact. While the <br />fund was still at 29% funded, and while we still needed an approximate $16 million to be fully <br />funded with only $5 million in the fund already, the pay increases did shrink the "fully funded" <br />trajectory from 33 years down to 23 years. This is of course a significant improvement. But I was <br />then educated on another key component in this equation. Our trajectory to a fully funded status <br />assumes that the retirement benefit payout itself will not change. In the early 2000s, the Board of <br />Trustees voted to set the benefit payout at $94 multiplied by your number of years of service, per <br />month. Therefore, if you worked 30 years (in any position/s), you will be paid approximately $94 <br />x 30 years of service x 12 months = $33,840.00 each year. If the Department voted to increase <br />this formula, it would increase the unfunded liability and thus push out our fully funded status. <br />This would also require an increase to the annual contribution by both the city and firefighter. <br />Currently the employee puts in 16% of their pay as contribution while the city puts in 14% (total <br />of 30%). This contribution, along with the current balance of approximately $5 million in the fund <br />as an investment, is what is currently keeping the fund afloat. However, I also learned that we are <br />spending more annually on benefits to current retirees than we are bringing in through collection. <br />Therefore, our trajectory will not be accomplished without an increase in the contribution and/or <br />a large deposit of funding in to the Pension fund by the city. In addition, the benefit payout bears <br />no relation to the amount of contribution you place in. Whether you make higher rank pay or <br />lower rank pay, you will still receive the same benefit amount for the same number of years of <br />service. <br />With the above information in hand, and after discussing this with our team, I reached the <br />following conclusions: <br />1. Under our current mode of operation, it is unlikely we will ever reach a fully funded status. <br />2. To simply deposit a large sum of money in to the fund requires a) money the city does not <br />have without issuing long term debt and b) accepting that in a few years, this process might <br />need to be repeated. <br />3. Reaching a fully funded status hinges on the department not increasing their benefit payout <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.