Laserfiche WebLink
of the Pension. If managed correctly, this funding would serve the life of the Pension and, in time, <br />when the last existing beneficiary passes away, the Pension would cease to exist. For existing <br />employees, when they retire, they would have a Pension account and a TMRS account. The two <br />combined should equate to something greater than what the current Pension would pay. In the <br />meantime, the employee will keep more of their paycheck (16% - 7% = 9%), which they could, in <br />turn, invest in a private retirement on the side (the city would not contribute towards that). It must <br />also be noted that the City of Paris maintains a State of Texas Section 218 Agreement (with some <br />amendments) for Social Security payments. This agreement from 1956 (with amendments in 1965 <br />and 1983) brought in all employees in to Social Security, excluding "emergency services", <br />"elective positions", and "fee basis positions". It should be noted that "police" was added in 1965 <br />while other emergency services remained excluded and EMS did not start until later, but they were <br />brought straight in to Social Security. To the point, the Fire Department is currently excluded <br />from Social Security. We are currently seeking legal confirmation, but it is our understanding at <br />this time that whatever is done to the Fire Pension in this process has no bearing on whether or not <br />the City and employee contributes to Social Security, until this agreement is ever amended. At <br />this time, we are not recommending this. If that were to occur, then the employee and City would <br />have to contribute the social security rate. <br />The Board of Trustees' actuary has opined that an approximate amount of $12 million will be <br />needed in a bond to fund the Pension. He has also determined that the TMRS retirement benefit <br />is more advantageous than the Pension retirement benefit for the employee. Unfortunately, TMRS <br />is not as direct and simple as a $94 multiplied by your number of years of service, per month, <br />calculation, so we cannot predict the final benefit for individual employees. We have, however, <br />created test cases which reasonably show that employees should have a greater return on <br />investment if converted to TMRS. <br />TMRS has made it plain that they will not touch the Pension itself; the Pension will forever be the <br />responsibility of the city and Board of Trustees. They, however, will onboard all the fire <br />department employees as if they were brand new employees in any other department. They would <br />be starting with a zero balance in their TMRS account, but that would grow with their <br />contributions. Their benefit would also be commensurate to their pay. The more they make, the <br />greater their retirement benefit will be. With the revamped pay schedule and a move to TMRS, <br />the desire to make a career with the City of Paris Fire Department and even to promote to a higher <br />rank should be more financially appealing than it was two years ago. <br />Along with the city's financial advisor and bond counsel, we are working out the needed steps to <br />issue a 20 year pension bond under state law. As a disclaimer, we can find no other precedent of <br />other communities having 1) taken out a pension bond, while simultaneously: 2) freezing their fire <br />pension, and 3) moving their employees to TMRS, so we have reached out to the Attorney General <br />to see if there are any additional steps they are going to ask of us. Our legal counsel feels quite <br />confident we have a way forward, but until that is ironed out, nothing is a guarantee. In addition, <br />we are working with the Board of Trustee legal counsel regarding pension -specific statutory <br />