My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/03/2022 Minutes
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2022
>
05/03/2022 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2022 1:24:51 PM
Creation date
6/10/2022 1:24:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. Public hearing to consider and take action on the petition of Armando Palacios, on behalf <br />of Alejandro Orfanos, regarding a 4'4" buffering variance to the City of Paris Buffering <br />Regulations, Section 30-102(3) on Lot 1, Block A, of the Taco Bueno Addition CB 250, <br />being located at 2320 NMain Street. <br />Andrew Mack, Director of Planning & Zoning, presented case to the board. Mr. Mack stated that <br />though there is a slight deficiency in the landscaping buffer on this lot when the neighboring lot <br />is developed the green space, buffer will be accommodated. Lastly, Mack stated that he <br />recommends approval of the variance based on the staff findings. <br />Mr. Walker declared the public hearing open. <br />Staff member, Paige Unger, makes note of an input form submitted as follows: <br />Gary Watson of 2430 N Main Street, in favor. <br />Hector Marroquin of 4515 Lyndon B Johnson Freeway, property owner and project manager <br />made himself available for any questions. <br />No one else spoke in favor or opposition of the request. <br />Public hearing was declared closed. <br />Motion was made by William Sanders, seconded by Jerry Haning to approve the 4'4" variance to <br />Section 30-102(3) of the Buffering Regulations to allow a 2'8" buffer on the south side of the <br />property versus the required 6' buffer based on the following staff recommended findings. Motion <br />carried 4-0. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS <br />1. The request for variance is harmony with the general purposes and intent of Zoning <br />Ordinance No. 1710, as amended, and will not negatively impact the protection for the <br />adjacent surrounding properties. <br />2. The request is to permit the new construction of a commercial restaurant which is not <br />applicable with regard to a "non -conforming use". Fast food drive-thru restaurants are <br />permitted by right in the C District. <br />3. There are special or unique conditions of restricted area for the existing lot, even though a <br />new plat approval of the land was just approved. This is not generally applicable to other <br />parcels of land in the same zoning district under new platting and development standards <br />where new lots are created. This has caused an unusual and practical difficulty to be in <br />compliance with the provisions sought here to be varied as a result of the original parcel <br />created making it nearly impossible to meet the side yard perimeter buffer yard green space <br />requirement. <br />4. The hardship sought to be avoided is not the result of (a) the applicant's own actions (self- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.