My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1984-065-RES WHEREAS, the City of Paris, has heretofore agreed upon the need for an historical survey of the City of
City-of-Paris
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
1889-2010
>
1930-1999
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
1984-065-RES WHEREAS, the City of Paris, has heretofore agreed upon the need for an historical survey of the City of
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2006 4:35:13 PM
Creation date
6/3/2005 9:46:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
1984
Doc Type
Resolution
CITY CLERK - Date
9/10/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />4-1720 <br /> <br />Federal Regisler <br /> <br />Vol. 48, No, 19b / Thursday, Septembe "9, 1983 / Notices <br /> <br />senerally stated in ~erms of properly <br />types, <br />The purpose of establishing <br />preservation goals is to set forth a "best <br />case" version of how properties in the <br />historic context should be identified, <br />evaluated, registered and treated. <br />Preservation goals should be oriented <br />toward the greatest possible protection <br />of properties in the historic context and <br />should be based on the principle that <br />properties should be preserved in place <br />if possible, through affirmative <br />treatments like rehabilitation. <br />stabilization or restoration. Generally. <br />goals will be specific to the historic <br />context and will often be phrased in <br />terms of property types. Some of these <br />goals will be related to information <br />needs previously id(~ntified for the <br />historic context. Collectively, the goals <br />for a historic context should be H <br />coherent statement of program direction <br />covering all aspects of the context. <br />For each goal. a statement should be <br />prepared identifying: <br />1. The goal. including the context and <br />property types to which the goal applies <br />and the geographical area in which they <br />are located; <br />2, The activities required to achieve <br />the goal; <br />3. The most appropriate methods or <br />strategies for carrying out the activities; <br />4. A schedule within which the <br />activities should be completed; and <br />5, The amount of effort required to <br />accomplish the goal. as well as 8 way to <br />evaluate progress toward its <br />accomplishment. <br /> <br />Setting priorities for gools <br /> <br />Once goals have been developed they <br />Tll'l'd (0 be ranked in importance. <br />Hanking involves examining each goal <br />in light of a number of factors. <br />1. Genera! social. economic, political <br />and environmental conditions and <br />trends affecting (positiVfdy and <br />negatively} the identification, <br />evalu3tion. registration and treatment of <br />property types in the historic context. <br />Some property types in the historic <br />context may be more directly threatened <br />by deterioration, land development <br />patterns, contemporary use patterns, or <br />public perceptions of their value, and <br />such property types should be given <br />priority considera tion. <br />2. Major cost or technical <br />considerations affecting the <br />identification. evaluation and treatment <br />of property types in the historic context. <br />The identification or treatment of <br />Some property types m{jY be technically <br />possible but the cost prohibitive; or <br />techniques may not currently perfected <br />(for example, the identification of <br />submerged sites or objects. or the <br /> <br />evaluation of sites containing material <br />for which dating techniques are still <br />being developed). <br />3. IdentificDtion. evaluation, <br />registration and treatment activities <br />previously cnrried out for property type!> <br />in the historic context. <br />If a number of properties representing <br />one aspect of a historic context have <br />been recorded or preserved, treatment <br />of additional members of that property <br />type may receive lower priority than <br />treatment of a property type for which <br />no examples have yet been recorded or <br />preserved. This approach ensures that <br />the focus of recording or preserving all <br />elements of ths historic context is <br />retained. rather than limiting activities <br />to preserving properties representing <br />only some aspects of the context. <br />The result of considering the goals in <br />light of these concerns will be a list of <br />refined goals ranked in order of priority. <br /> <br />Integrating Individual Contexts- <br />Creating the Preservation Plan <br /> <br />When historic contexts overlap <br />geographically. competinH goals and <br />priorities must be integrated for <br />effective preservation planning. The <br />ranking of goals for each historic <br />context must be reconciled to ensure <br />that recommendations for one context <br />do not contradict those for another. This <br />important step results in an overall set <br />of priorities for several historic contexts <br />and a list of the activities to be <br />performed to achieve the ranked goals. <br />When applied to a specific geographical <br />area, this is the preservation plan for <br />that area. <br />It is expected that in many instnnces <br />historic context.'! will overbp <br />,1.wographicaJly. Overlllpping contexts <br />are likely to Occur in two <br />combinations-those that were defined <br />at the same scale (Le., textile <br />development in Smith town H150-1B10 <br />and Civil Wllr in Srnithtown HJ55-11)70) <br />and those defined at different scales <br />(i.e., Civil War in Srnithtown dnd Civil <br />\-Var in the Shenandoah Valley). The <br />contexts may share the same property <br />types. although the shared properly <br />types will probably have different levels <br />of importance. or they may group the <br />same properties into different property <br />types. reflecting either a different scale <br />of analysis or a different historical <br />perspective. <br />As previously noted. many of the <br />goals that the formulated for a historic <br />context will focus on the property types <br />defined for that context. Thus it is <br />critical that the integration of goals <br />include the explicit consideration of the <br />potential for shared property type <br />membership by Individual properties. <br />For example, when the same property <br /> <br />.,,, .... . . "~'-' <br /> <br />types are llsed by two contexts. <br />reconciling tbe goals will require <br />weighing the level of importance <br />assigned to each property type. The <br />degree to which integration of historic <br />contexts mllst involve reconciling <br />property types may be limited by the <br />coordinated development of historic <br />contexts used at various levels. <br />Integration with Management <br />Frameworks <br />Preservation goals and priorities are <br />adapted to land units through <br />integration with other planning <br />concerns. This integration must involve <br />the resolution of conflicts that arise <br />when competing resources occupy the <br />SHme land b3se. Successful resolution of <br />these conflicts can often be achieved <br />through judicious combination of <br />inventory, evaluation and treatment <br />activities, Since historic properties are <br />irreplaceable, these activities should be <br />heavily weighted to discourage the <br />de!'>truction of significant properties and <br />to be compatible with the primary land <br />use. <br />Recommended Sources of Technical <br />Information <br />Resource Protection Planning Process. <br />Slate and Plans Grants Division. 1980. <br />Washington, D.C. Available from Survey and <br />Planning Branch. Interogency Resources <br />Division. National Park Service, Department <br />of the Interior. Washington. D.C. 20240. <br />Outlines a step.by,slep upproach to <br />implementing the resource protection <br />plunning process. <br />llvsource Protection Planning Process Cose <br />Studies. Available from Survey and PlanninR <br />Branch. Intl'raRency Resollfces Division. <br />Naliorlal Purk Service, lJepartmenl oE the <br />Interior. Washington. D.C. 20240. Reports <br />prepared by State Historic Preservation <br />Offices and other using the planning process. <br />Plollning Theory. Andreas Faludi. 1980. <br />Oxford: Pergumon Pre&~. Constructs a model <br />of plunning using concepts borroweJ from <br />general gyslems theory. <br /> <br />SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S <br />STANDARDS FOR IDENTIFICATION <br /> <br />Identification activities are <br />undertaken to gather information about <br />historic properties in an Hrca. The scope <br />of these activities will d[~pend on: <br />existing knowledge about properties; <br />goals for survey activities developed in <br />the planning process: and current <br />management needs. <br /> <br />Standard I. Identification of Historic <br />Properties /s Undertaken to the Degree <br />Required To Make Decisions <br /> <br />Archival research and survey <br />activities should be designed to gather <br />the information necessary to achieve <br />defined preservation goals. The <br /> <br />..- .....,.-~.~.,. ~..;:. .;.. .....r':......;,.::;:;<O;'>,~....~ .I.~. <br /> <br />j".~ <br /> <br />~_,~'"._,~J,ji!~, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.