My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1984-065-RES WHEREAS, the City of Paris, has heretofore agreed upon the need for an historical survey of the City of
City-of-Paris
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
1889-2010
>
1930-1999
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
1984-065-RES WHEREAS, the City of Paris, has heretofore agreed upon the need for an historical survey of the City of
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2006 4:35:13 PM
Creation date
6/3/2005 9:46:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
1984
Doc Type
Resolution
CITY CLERK - Date
9/10/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
View images
View plain text
<br />Federal R( <br /> <br />er I Vol. 48. No. 190 I Thursday. Sept <br /> <br />er 29. 1983 I Notices' <br /> <br />44725 <br /> <br />particular historic contexl This is done <br />by reviewing the previously developed <br />narrative for the historic context and <br />determining how the criteria would <br />apply to properties in that context. <br />based on the important patterns, events,. <br />persons and cultural values identified. <br />[See the discussion of the historic <br />context narrative in the Guidelines for <br />Preservation Planning.) This step <br />includes identification of which criteria <br />each property type might meet and how <br />integrity is to be evaluated for each <br />property type under each criterion. <br />Specific guidelines for evaluating the <br />eligibility of individual properties should <br />be established. These guidelines should <br />outline and justify the specific physical <br />characteristics or dnta requirements that <br />all individual properly must possess to <br />retain integrity for the particular <br />property type; and define the process by <br />which revisions or additions can be <br />made to the evaluation framework. <br />Consideration of property type and <br />intergrity: After considering how the <br />criteria apply to the particular historic <br />context, the evaluation process for a <br />property generally includes the <br />following steps: <br />1. A property is classified as to the <br />appropriate historic context(s) and <br />property type{s). If no existing property <br />type is appropriate.. a new property type <br />is defined, its values identified. and the <br />specific characteristics or data <br />requirements are outlined and justified <br />as an addition to the historic context. If <br />necessary. a new historic context is <br />defined for which values and property <br />Iy'pes and their integrity requirements <br />are identified and justified. <br />2. A comparison is made between the <br />existing information about the property <br />and the integrity characteristics or data <br />required for the property type. <br />a. If the comparison shows that the <br />property pOssesses these characteristics. <br />then it is evaluated as :Jignificnnt for <br />that historic context. The evaluation <br />includes a determination that the <br />property retains integrity for its type. <br />b. If the comparison shows that the <br />property does not meet the minimum <br />requirements. one of several conclusions <br />is reached: <br />(1) The properly is determined not <br />significant because it does not :etain the <br />integrity defined for the property type. <br />(2) The property has characteristics <br />that may make it significant but these <br />djffer from those expected for that <br />property type in that context. In this <br />case, the historic context or property <br />types should be reexamined and revised <br />if necessary, based on subsequent <br />research and survev. <br />The evalUation should state how the <br /> <br />particular property meets the integrity <br /> <br />requirements for its type. When a <br />property is disqualified for los~ of <br />integrity. the evaluation statement <br />should focus on the kinds of integrity <br />expected for the property type. those <br />that are absent for the disqualified <br />property, nnd the impact of that absence <br />on the property's ability to exemplify <br />architectural. historical or research <br />values within a particular historic <br />context. <br />The integrity of the property in its <br />current condition. rather than its likely <br />condition after a proposed treatment, <br />should be evaluated. Factors such as <br />structural problems. deterioration. or <br />abandonment should be considered in <br />the evaluation only if they have affected <br />the integrity of the significant fl:;ltlln:s or <br />characteristics of the property. <br />"- <br />Invelltory <br />An inventory is a repository of <br />informa tion on specific properties <br />evaluated as significant. <br />Content: The inventory should <br />include: <br />1. Summaries of the important historic <br />contexts. These may be in the form of an <br />approved plan or analyses of historic <br />contexts important in the history of the <br />geographical area covered by the <br />inventory, <br />2. De9:criptions of significant property <br />types of these contexts., whether or not <br />any specific properties have been <br />identified. <br />3. Results of reconnaissance surveys. <br />or other identification activities. even if <br />the level of infurmation on specific <br />properties identIfied as part of those <br />activities is not sufficient to evaluate <br />individual properties_ <br />4. Information on individual properties <br />that was used in evaluation. <br />Historic contexts are identified by <br />name, with reference to documents <br />describing those contextfl, or with a <br />narrative statement about the conte.xt{s) <br />where sucb documents do not exist. <br />A dCflcription of the property. Part of <br />this description may be a photographic <br />record. <br />A statement that justifies the <br />significance of the property in relation to <br />its context(s). This statement should <br />include an analysis of the integrity of <br />the property. <br />Boundaries of the property. <br />^ record of when a property wag <br />evaluated and included in the inventory, <br />and bv whom. ~ <br />Records on demolished or altered <br />properties and properties evaluated as <br />not si,lSnificant should be retained. along <br />with full description of areae surveyed. <br />for the ptannill.~ information these <br />records provide about impucts to <br />properties and about the location and <br /> <br />character of non~significant properties <br />to prevent redundant identification work <br />at u later time. <br />Maintenance: Inventory entries should <br />be maintained so that they accurately <br />represent what is known about historic <br />properties in the ah~a covered by the <br />inventory. This will include new <br />information gained from research and <br />survey about the historic cnntexts. <br />property types. and previously <br />evaluated properties., us weU as: <br />information about newly evaluated <br />properties. For individual properties. <br />addition of kinds of significance, change <br />in the boundaric~. or loss of significance <br />through demolition or alteration should <br />be recorded. <br />Uses (lnd Avoilability: An inventory <br />should be managed 80 that the <br />information is uccessibl.e_ Its usefulness <br />depends on the organization of <br />information and on its l:Ioilty to <br />incorporate new information. An <br />inventory should be structu:ed so that <br />entries can be retrieved by locality or by <br />historic context. <br />The availability of the inventory <br />information should be announced or a <br />summary should be distributed. This <br />may be tn the form of a list of properties <br />evaluated as significant or a summary of <br />the historic contexts and the kinds of <br />properties in the inventory. Irrventories <br />should be avHable to managers, <br />planners, and the general public at local. <br />State. regiona~ and Federal agency <br />levels. <br />It is necessary to protect infonnation <br />about archeological site:! or other <br />properties whose integrity may be <br />damaged by widespread knowledge of <br />their location..It may also be necessary <br />to protect information on the location of <br />propertie5 such as religious sites, <br />structures, or objects whose cultuwl <br />value would be compromised by public <br />knowledge of the property's location. <br /> <br />Recommended Sources of Technical <br />InfoI'lJlotioll <br /> <br />How to Apply the National Register <br />Critera. Available through the National <br />Register Branch, Interagency Resources <br />Division, Nationul Park Service. U.S. <br />Department of the interior. Washington., <br />D.C. 20240. Provides detalied technical <br />information about inte-rpretation of the <br />significance a.nd integrity criteria used <br />by the National Register of Historic <br />Places program. <br />How To Series. Available through the <br />National Register Branch, Interngency <br />Resources Division, National Park <br />Service. U.S. Department of the Interior, <br />Washington. D.C. 20240. Discu.'Jges <br />applicBtion of the National Rcgiater <br />criteria for evaluation, Titles include: <br /> <br />.-" _.."~. -,..". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).