Laserfiche WebLink
274 <br /> <br /> <br /> City's monetary participation in some of these projects. City Manager Malone stated . · ~' <br /> that the City consists of citizens that voted for the tax to pay for the infrastructure <br /> to serve industry. Boardmember Bray said he was speaking about funds that the <br /> City has available in bonds that haven't been used versus the Board's funds <br /> available and the capacity to use those funds in other areas. City Manager Malone <br /> stated this Board is a part of City government. <br /> <br /> City Attorney Haynes said it was discussed at the end of the first year when the <br /> board decided that they did not wish to set aside funds for accumulation. He said <br /> the bylaws provided for setting aside funds. Boardmember Rhodes said the Board <br /> must be able to fund a viable request for new industry. President Fendley asked if <br /> the Council had discussed participating in funding any of these projects. City <br /> Manager Malone advised that the Council expected that the P.E.D.C. would <br /> contribute the money for these projects. President Fendley called for any other <br /> questions or discussion on this item, and there was none. <br /> <br /> President Fendley stated that in regard to the next agenda item that Mr. Don Wilson <br /> had approached the P.E.D.C. and the City approximately one year ago regarding <br /> access for truck traffic to Rogers Wade and also Red River Transport on 4th Street. <br /> He said apparently, they have truck traffic of approximately 108 trucks per week and <br /> he has asked the City to look at the street behind the jail and along the railway. He <br /> said that's when P.E.D.C. asked City Engineer Earl Smith to bring a plan and cost <br /> estimate to the Board for consideration. City Engineer Earl Smith said that he had <br /> done a general plan which is a straight shot across the back of the jail and straight. <br /> through to 4th Street.. Mr. Smith said, keeping the primary purpose in mind, that he <br /> estimated this street to be a 39 ft. wide street back-to-back,with 8 inches of thick reinforced <br /> concrete. He said after considering right-of-way preparation including engineering <br /> costs, if a consultant is needed, he estimated a cost of $260,000.00 for this project. He <br /> said that did not consider any substantial drainage problems in this project or <br /> problems with utilities. Mr. Smith said that this is wider than your normal residential <br /> street but that he had compared what we built at the back entrance of Campbell's <br /> Soup, which was more than a regular residential type street. President Fendley <br /> asked if the concrete versus the asphalt was a substantial number increase. Mr. <br /> Smith said that he has always felt, in a fair evaluation of concrete versus asphalt, that <br /> they are about the same costs, especially if there is heavy traffic involved. He said <br /> this cost estimate is a little bit high because it would run across the old cotton <br /> compress site where there is a large amount of concrete. He said not knowing <br /> what the street grade would be, he assumed that a large amount of the concrete <br /> would have to be removed, so he hit right-of-way preparation hard in this cost <br /> estimate. <br /> <br /> Boardmember Bray asked Mr. Smith if it would be possible to narrow the road down <br /> and have a larger radius down at the street where the trucks turn. Boardmember <br /> Bray said perhaps some money could be saved by doing that and probably still go <br /> with concrete. President Fendley called for further discussion and questions on this <br /> item. Mr. Smith said that the method of determination he used was in accordance <br /> with the Master Street Plan where we have 28, 39 and 44 ft. streets. President <br /> Fendley said we should look at several different options and come back to this <br /> group in one month, possibly get some bids on it and look at it. City Engineer Smith <br /> said that this cost estimate does not include the cost of acquisition of right-of-way. <br /> President Fendley asked for further discussion and there was none. <br /> <br /> <br />