Laserfiche WebLink
OPTIONS: <br />The City Manager has developed a process he goes through for considering when (if) to forgive <br />principal and/or interest for Nuisance Liens (liens that he is tasked with reviewing). It is not perfect, <br />but this procedure allows him to remain fairly consistent each time. Given there are so many <br />different factors and scenarios involved with properties all over town, the City Manager attempts <br />to adhere to two goals: <br />1. Protect the taxpayer dollar — resist forgiving liens whenever possible given taxpayers had <br />expense in maintaining the property, while <br />2. Finding a way to get the property in to the hands of someone who will maintain — possibly <br />develop — the property, thus alleviating the taxpayers of having to further maintain the <br />property (note: this has not been an issue in this specific situation). <br />Taking in to consideration both goals, the City Manager's analysis in this situation is as follows: <br />the value of the lien (principal + interest) greatly exceeds the value of the property, although the <br />value of the property exceeds the value of the principal of the lien. The owner at the time of the <br />demolition has since passed away and descendants have inherited the property in recent years <br />(2020). This property has been maintained in the past, taxes paid, and no other nuisance violations <br />are on file, therefore there are no issues that would require tax foreclosure. This property does not <br />appear to be one of our current nuisance sites, although the northern block of this area is heavily <br />wooded, thus it could in time become a nuisance if not developed. What Mr. Faber has offered to <br />do, pay the principle, seems fair given the value of the interest + principle greatly exceeds the <br />value of the property, making it unlikely to ever be sold if payment of interest is expected. <br />However, given the taxpayers had actual expenses of $3,070.15 to demolish this house and given <br />this is less than the value of the property, it is appropriate to try and pursue that amount. Therefore, <br />the City Council has the following options: <br />1. .Approve a Resolution for release of the lien against 245 NE 2nd Street and: <br />a. Receive payment of the $3,070.15 Principle while waiving interest applied to the <br />August 2, 2006 Structure Lien. <br />b. Waiver of principle and interest applied to the August 2, 2006 Structure Lien. <br />c. No waiver of principle and/or interest. <br />d. Waiver of a portion (TBD) of the principle and/or interest. <br />2. Request additional information. <br />3. Do not release the lien or waive any portion of the August 2, 2006 Structure Lien. <br />