My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2023
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
08-08-2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 10:48:11 AM
Creation date
8/15/2023 8:30:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
employees receiving a full increase under the current plan (currently about half of the employees get a <br />biennial increase in one year and the other half receive their increase in the next). <br />Regarding item #3 — While the rates are not typically known until the budget process is complete, our <br />communications with TML show that we expect another sizable rate increase beginning in January 2024. <br />Without knowing how much this may be, and given limitations with available budget, we have budgeted to <br />increase the City's monthly contribution another $30 for each employee to help offset the upcoming rate <br />increases. <br />Regarding item #4 — The City of Paris continues to struggle with hiring and retaining our police force (sworn <br />officers). As of July 2023, the department is down 16 patrol positions. Over the past three years, we have lost <br />26 sworn officers while only gaining 14. This same time period began with a vacancy list in existence. The <br />City has dramatically increased the pay via the comparable pay study as well as seniority pay, certification <br />pay, sign on bonuses, and allowing for lateral transfers with years of service. However, we continue to <br />struggle in this market. So as to try and stay ahead — or at the very least keep up —with local competition, we <br />have proposed a higher COLA adjustment for the police department than that under item #1 above. In order <br />to balance the budget, we could not do one rate across the board for all officers, and given our greatest need <br />is new officers, we have created a new scale that adjusts the starting base for a patrolman position up by 8% <br />($52k to $56k) while only increasing the highest seniority level of the Assistant Chief of Police position by <br />2%. With this, we shifted the entire scale in between these two end posts like we did during the comparable <br />pay study. Every sworn position will therefore receive no less than a 2% COLA, in addition to the pay <br />increases they will see under item #2 above. In order to financially accomplish this, we have unbudgeted a <br />majority of the remaining vacant police positions, which is similar to the practice we have done each of the <br />past three years in order to accomplish our budgetary goals, particularly the comparable pay study. However, <br />we will continue to seek out and hire new officers as quickly as possible in order to make up the entire <br />vacancy list until we are fully staffed. Given historically we have been unsuccessful in filling these vacant <br />positions, to continually budget for them while trying to maintain a balanced — and tight — budget with pay <br />adjustments for our employees, has become challenging. Therefore, in order to still try and maintain a flat <br />property tax levy for our tax payers in FY23/24, we are going to take advantage of this available budget room <br />within the vacant positions to increase our pay for existing police positions (retain), which we hope will <br />further draw more applicants (attract and hire). Should we successfully hire more officers, we will simply <br />have to amend our budget and account for it in FY24/25 and beyond, which is the ultimate conclusion — to <br />be at full staff. However, given the hiring process takes many months, the financial risk to the City in FY23/24 <br />seems relatively low. This is a departure from our typical methodology of keeping several vacant positions <br />budgeted, however, we need this funding in order to implement yet another financial strategy to attract and <br />retain officers to begin filling these vacant positions as soon as possible. It must be noted that the un - <br />budgeting of vacant officer positions was done strictly to offset the above stated plan to increase our police <br />department's pay, and not to assist with any other position's pay or municipal service expense. The above <br />stated amounts determined as increases for the police department were the result of the available sum total <br />of funding from the vacant positions. Had there been more funding in these vacant positions, the amount of <br />increases would likely have been higher. <br />Another significant pay item that is worth noting is that of the EMS Department. In short, I have struggled <br />to correctly estimate the EMS Department salary lines when developing each of my budgets the past three <br />years. EMS has the most complicated pay arrangement of all departments, CoVid-19 and staff shortages have <br />not made this any easier. It was brought to my attention this year that changes to the shift scheduling were <br />made that we had not sufficiently budgeted for. We have therefore attempted to adjust for this. Additional <br />changes will be discussed under the New Position category below. <br />By request of the Municipal Judge, a step plan has been proposed and included in the Proposed FY23/24 <br />Budget unless otherwise directed by the City Council. Having gone many years without a significant pay <br />increase, the Municipal Judge has requested a scale that places his position at 1/2 that of the City Attorney's <br />Page 10 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.