Laserfiche WebLink
as the accumulated interest, with the release of the lien on the property so that she can sell it. She <br />has though offered to pay up to $500.00 in interest if requested (did not say how she came to that <br />number). There was a closing date of July 24th to Rosa Salazar, but the lien came up and so they <br />have extended the date until this can be resolved. The selling price is $9,500.00. Ms. Salazar wishes <br />to purchase the property and hold as an investment property. The property is currently valued at <br />$1,130.00 on LCAD. <br />Pursuant to City Code 4.03.009, only the City Council can consider waiving a Structure Lien. <br />BUDGET: <br />There is no new expense to the City in this situation to agree to releasing the lien. The principal of <br />the lien is $1,469.65. The accumulated interest is approximately $6,129.34 (as of 9/11/23). The <br />total of the lien is therefore approximately $7,598.99. The value of the property is $1,130.00 <br />according to LCAD. There are no delinquent taxes and no other liens (according to our records). <br />OPTIONS: <br />The City Manager has developed a process he goes through for considering when (if) to forgive <br />principal and/or interest for Nuisance Liens (liens that he is tasked with reviewing). It is not perfect, <br />but this procedure allows him to remain fairly consistent each time. Given there are so many <br />different factors and scenarios involved with properties all over town, the City Manager attempts <br />to adhere to two goals: <br />1. Protect the taxpayer dollar — resist forgiving liens (at least the principle) whenever possible <br />given taxpayers had expense in maintaining the property, while <br />2. Finding a way to get the property in to the hands of someone who will maintain — possibly <br />develop — the property, thus alleviating the taxpayers of having to further maintain the <br />property (note: this has not been an issue in this specific situation). <br />Taking in to consideration both goals, the City Manager's analysis in this situation is as follows: <br />the value of the lien (principal + interest) greatly exceeds the value of the property. Information <br />that we do not always have is the selling price, which in this situation exceeds the value of the <br />principal and interest. This property was allegedly the home of a grandmother, purchased by the <br />current listed owners in 1989 (LCAD). One of these listed owners, the mother, passed in 2005 (a <br />year prior to the BSC) and the remaining owner claims that all notices likely went to her. We have <br />records going back to 2011 that all yard and grass notices that went out were addressed by the <br />owner. All taxes and any other nuisance liens — only one other made it to a lien — have all been <br />paid, therefore this property is not eligible for foreclosure and given the last remaining owner <br />resides in California, it is likely to assume the property will sit vacant. <br />