My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08 - Disannexation Request - 3197 FM 1497 - First Public Hearing
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2024
>
03 - MARCH
>
03-11-2024
>
08 - Disannexation Request - 3197 FM 1497 - First Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2024 9:45:23 AM
Creation date
3/7/2024 9:40:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 27—March 7, 2024—Publish notice of second public hearing in the Paris News <br />(publication must be between the 20th and the 10`h day out from the second public hearing). <br />Note: The city may publish a single notice for both hearings on either Tuesday, February <br />27th or Thursday February 29`h or Thursday July 1St as the two notice periods overlap. <br />Completed. <br />March 11 2024—Citj Council Meeting -11' publig,hearim, 'public hearin rs must be held <br />between the 4011 and 20' days out from action on the ordinance to disannex <br />March 18, 2024—Special Meeting, City Council -2nd public hearing (in order to get in both <br />hearings done in that 20 day period, and because of our 2' and 0 Monday schedule and how that <br />falls on the calendar, Council will have to hold a special meeting to get in the 2nd public hearing) <br />April 8,2024—City Council Meeting—Act on ordinance to disannex (day 77 from institution of <br />disannexation proceedings). <br />BUDGET: None. The owner is tax exempt and does not pay ad valorem taxes on the property. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Conduct the first of two public hearings on the disannexation <br />application. This item is for a public hearing only, and Council will take no action on the item. <br />' From my memorandum of January 22nd, for your easy reference: <br />The reasons for requesting disannexation do not fall within any valid reason for disannexation under the <br />City's annexation/disannexation policy or state law; however, as can be seen below, the city limits line (in <br />yellow) moves on a fairly straight line until it gets to the church's property then jags around to take in the <br />church property and the parcel directly to the north. We could find no record of why the annexation line <br />was drawn this way. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.