Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment Meeting <br />June 4, 2024 <br />Page 3 <br />10) variance to allow a billboard to be altered beyond maintenance, Section <br />4.10.010(a)(1). <br />Mr. Hamilton opened the public hearing to be continued at the next meeting. <br />5. Public hearing to consider and take action on the petition of Christopher Martinez <br />regarding a lot width variance to the City of Paris Area Regulations, Section 9-201(1) on <br />Lot 11, City Block 53, being located at 373 NW 50' Street. <br />Mr. Hamilton opened the public hearing. <br />Building Official, Duke McGee, presented case to the board. <br />No one else spoke in favor or opposition of the request. <br />Public hearing was declared closed. <br />Motion was made by Larry Walker, seconded by Ben Vaughan to approve the variance to <br />the City of Paris Area Regulations, Sections 9-201(1) Lot Width based on the following <br />condition and findings. Motion carried 4 ayes — 0 nays. <br />Board Recommended Condition <br />1. All structure setbacks shall be met. <br />BRA s <br />1. The request for variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of site <br />improvement regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance 1710 Exhibit 9B and the <br />Subdivision Ordinance 1315 Exhibit 9A; and will protect the character of the immediate <br />vicinity of the area. <br />2. The approval of the variance for lot width will allow the plat to be approved without a condition <br />for variance allowing a single-family residence to be constructed. <br />3. There are special and unique condition(s) of existing sub -standard lot width which are not <br />applicable to all other existing parcels of land in the 2F Zoning District, and which cause <br />unusual and practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the use of the property with site <br />improvements permitted by the ordinance with the provision sought here to be varied. The <br />residential lot was previously created, consistent with the adjoining residential lots, but was <br />not officially platted. <br />4. The hardship sought to be avoided is not the result of (a) the applicant's own actions (self- <br />imposed or self-created), but rather it is based upon existing site parcel dimensions to support <br />new construction. <br />5. The provision of the ordinance regulation that are sought to be varied, deprive the applicant of <br />reasonable rights to use the property that are commonly enjoyed by other older residential <br />