Laserfiche WebLink
Ifat any time the reader of this memorandum has any questions, please contact the City Manager’s office at City Hall. <br />We will be more than happy to answer any questions you have. <br />Summary <br />Prior to getting started with the substance of this memorandum, wewould like to present to you a few initial summary <br />results regarding the Property Tax Levy and Rate, as well as the balancing of the Operational Funds. <br />Of greatest interest to most any Council Member and citizen is the impact of the proposed budget to the Property Tax <br />Rate and Levy.The City has a Maintenance and Operation(M & O) property tax rate and a Debt Service (sometimes <br />also referred to as “Interest and Sinking” or “I&S”) property tax rate.These rates, once applied against the property <br />valuation, produce the tax levy (the dollars the City receives).The M & Orate is subject to Senate Bill 2 (2019)growth <br />restrictions year to year while the Debt Service rate is not; both will be discussed in further detail later in this <br />memorandum.The Proposed FY24/25Budget assumes an M&O rate of $0.30373 which is the voter-approval M&O <br />rate. This rate is only $0.01027 higherthan the No New Revenue rate of $0.29346 and gives the City $254,500 in <br />additional revenue. The City has held its O&M taxes at the same amount ($8,030,000) for the last three years, With <br />the current inflationary pressures, the City cannot continue to operate at that level of income. The Debt Service levy <br />isproposed to decreasedue to the SuRRMA Loan being paid in full this year(23/24).Inthe proposed FY24/25budget <br />the total combined property tax rate between M & Oand Debt Service is decreasingby 2.581 cents.Changes in <br />property valuations through the Lamar County Appraisal District impact the final rate associated with our budgeted <br />levy amounts.The following lists theFY21/22, FY22/23, FY23/24and the ProposedFY24/25tax rates: <br />YearM&ODebtTotal <br />FY21/22$0.37357$0.08016$0.45373 <br />FY22/23$0.34377$0.09901$0.44278 <br />FY23/24$0.32176$0.15606$0.47782 <br />FY24/25$0.30373$0.14828$0.45201Preliminary <br />The following represents a comparison of these tax rates against that of the Proposed FY24/25tax rate: <br />FY24/25FundFY21/22FY22/23FY23/24 <br />$0.30373M & O($0.06984)($0.04176)($0.01803) <br />$0.14828Debt$0.06812$0.04927($0.00778) <br />$0.45201Total($0.00172)$0.00923($0.02581) <br />The Proposed FY24/25Tax Rateis, to the best of our determination using the Comptroller’s Forms, infull compliance <br />with Senate Bill 2, also known as the Texas Property Tax Reform and Transparency Act of 2019, approved by the <br />Texas Legislature in 2019.Among other things, this Act is designed to restrict the City’s ability to raise property taxes. <br />This is a double-edgedsword.Wewill provide more details regarding this Actlater in this memorandum, nevertheless, <br />given the restrictions this Actplaces upon municipalities, it is strongly recommended that the City of Paris utilize the <br />allowed restricted growth passed by the State Legislature when needed to keep up with the vital services we offer the <br />citizens.To fall behind under this legislation could eventually prove irreversible thus detrimental to the desired <br />operations and services the citizens expect of the City.The key point in ourabove statement however is “when <br />needed”.In FY22/23,the City did not use its full 3.5% growth due to better-than-expected Sales Tax revenue.Instead, <br />we left $0.00681 available to be utilized if ever needed in the next three years (SB-2 allows it to remain available for <br />up to three years before disappearing forever).In addition, we have balanced our budget using the 97%value of the <br />total estimated property taxes to be received under the M & O property tax rate. Historically, the City never receives <br />100% of the property tax levied, a table is shown later in this memorandumillustrating this, thus why foreclosures <br />occur from time to time, but rather we typically hover around 97%. Therefore, it is logical to utilize a more realistic <br />Page 2of 18 <br /> <br />