My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
08-11-2025
>
Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2025 4:42:40 PM
Creation date
8/7/2025 4:40:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
❑ Task 1.2: Determine the Scope of Work (SOW) <br />Determine the scope of services needed to successfully apply for and implement the HRA contract. The <br />scope of work should itemize the tasks needed, with timeframes and achievable goals. <br />TDHCA standard Performance Statement, included in the Sample Administrative Contract, contains the <br />scope of services. <br />Adm nistratjon/Proje.ct D.eliverySorviG s/ crn truce on,#"1 o emeCtx G. pe of Work <br />A detailed Scope of Work ("SOW") for HRA administration/project delivery services/construction management <br />is provided with this packet. The administration/project delivery services/construction management service <br />provider to be hired will provide grant administration and contract -related project delivery services. <br />Taskl,$; Determine the Written Selection Criteria to Evaluate Respondents <br />❑ Administration/Project Delivery Services/Construction Management <br />Use the Sample Administration/Project Delivery Services/Construction Management Rating Sheet on page 9 <br />or develop your own written weighted criteria that will be used to select the Administration/Project Delivery <br />Services/Construction Management Provider(s) based on the proposed HRA project. Proposals for the <br />program must be scored accordingly. For example: <br />.................... <br />Criteria <br />Maximum Points <br />Experience of the Firm <br />_........ --.... <br />45 <br />®.�.. ........___ <br />-- <br />Prior Wo...... <br />rkPerformance <br />......... ..... _--- <br />25 <br />Capacity to Perform _.....w.., ______ <br />25 _....... _.._ .. <br />Proposed Cost <br />_.m....w_.. _ ._.. ........_.... ............. <br />.......... <br />__......... <br />5 <br />Total100 <br />You may also develop your own written weighted criteria to select the Administration/Project Delivery <br />Services/Construction Management Provider(s). If you develop your own criteria, proposed cost must be <br />ric lu. 1. -d, and the Selection Review Committee may determine the relative weight of this factor. All relative <br />weights must be disclosed to bidders in the solicitation, and the relative weights must be followed. Example <br />provided on page 9: Sample Proposal Rating Sheet for Homeowner Reconstruction Assistance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.