Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 2006-081 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, <br />TEXAS, DENYING ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION'S <br />STATEMENT OF INTENT TO INCREASE THE GAS UTILITY RATES IN <br />THIS MUNICIPALITY; SUPPORTING THE REDUCTION OF EXISTING <br />NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION RATES CURRENTLY CHARGED BY <br />A TMOS MID- TEX WITHIN THE CITY; ORDERING ATMOS MID- TEX TO <br />REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR ITS REASONABLE COSTS INCURRED IN <br />RATE-MAKING PROCEEDINGS OR APPEALS OF SAID PROCEEDINGS; <br />AUTHORIZING THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE TO ACT <br />ON BEHALF OF CITY AND INTERVENE IN ANY PROCEEDINGS BEFORE <br />ADMINISTRATIVE OR JUDICIAL BODIES; REQUIRING DELIVERY OF <br />THIS RESOLUTION TO THE COMPANY AND LEGAL COUNSEL; AND <br />FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION IS <br />ADOPTED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Paris, Paris, Texas ("City") is a regulatory authority under the Gas <br />Utility Regulatory Act ("GURA") and has original jurisdiction over the gas utility rates of Atmos <br />Energy Corp., Mid. Tex Division (the "Company"); and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City, along with 87 other Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC") cities, <br />exercised its authority under ~~ 103.001 and 104.151, GURA, to initiate a proceeding to determine <br />whether the existing rates of the Company were unreasonable or in any way in violation of any <br />provision oflaw and ordered the Company to show cause regarding the reasonableness of its existing <br />natural gas distribution rates within the City; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Company filed its rate filing package with the City in response to the City's <br />order on or about December 31,2005, and the City's representatives obtained additional information <br />from the Company through written requests for information; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City's consultants and representatives, through cooperative efforts and under <br />the direction ofthe ACSC, reviewed the information and recommended that the City reduce the rates <br />charged by the Company within the City; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, by its own action pursuant to GURA S 104.151 (a) or by procedural agreement <br />with the Company, the City reduced the current natural gas rates charged by the Company within the <br />City effective May 31, 2006; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Company has bonded in its existing rates with the Railroad Commission as <br />part of its appeal of rates set by ACSC cities; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, as part of its appeal of city rate actions taken by ACSC members, the Company <br />filed a Statement ofIntent to Increase the Gas Utility Rates within the City effective July 5, 2006; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Company's request is unreasonable based upon the information already <br />reviewed by the City in response to its action initiating the show cause action; NOW, THEREFORE, <br />