|
<br />, "
<br />
<br />.......
<br />
<br />(. " "
<br />
<br />"...-,,'
<br />
<br />( .' .
<br />" .
<br />'-
<br />
<br />'. ",
<br />
<br />,- """
<br />
<br />"." '.
<br />
<br />, ,
<br />, "....
<br />i' ",' '~'., '..
<br />\ .:: ,'....:. "'.'
<br />'.. .
<br />. '. ~ ' . .
<br />~ . ".: :.: ': ':" :..':. ,:-:':: ~.:: , '":',
<br />.' ,",."
<br />
<br />. ,. ",f
<br />
<br />",",
<br />
<br />,',",'" "
<br />
<br />. .
<br />
<br />'.,
<br />",'
<br />
<br />ACREEHENT APPOR'1'lONING F.XTRATEP,Rl'l'ORIAL
<br />JURISDICTION OVEP.LAP
<br />
<br />This Agreement macle (tnd entered into hetween the CITY
<br />OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS,' tI m\lnicipnl corporntioh, acti.nl~ by
<br />and through its Mayor, Joe Graham, ~uly authorized by
<br />Resolution of its City Council, attested by its City Clerk,
<br />II. C. Greene, and approved it:; to form by it:~; City At torney,
<br />
<br />T. K. Haynes, hereafter called PARIS, and the CITY OF RENO,
<br />TEXAS, ~cting herein by Dnd throuch itn Mayor, attested by
<br />its City Sel~rcitnry, both officers bri.ng 1I1.1thorlzed to act in
<br />the piemises by Ordinnnce or it~ City CommissiDn duly
<br />nd(lpted, hereafter en lled RENO, I.1gn'e thnt' tlw following
<br />
<br />facts exist and arc true:
<br />
<br />]. The City of PARIS i.s ~l 11011I(\ rll]p eLl': "~l1til.led to
<br />:m ext'rilti~rritori,ll' j\lri~<1ir.ti.on c()n~i.!:tiJlI~ of :Ill tll{'
<br />
<br />contiguous unincorporated ar~n not ~ p~rt of nny other city,
<br />
<br />within two (2.0) mile::: of its corponlte lirldts undp.r the
<br />
<br />provisions of Article 970n, n~ umended, Revised Civil
<br />
<br />Statutes of Texas, the Municipnl Annexation Act, hereafter
<br />
<br />called Act.
<br />
<br />2. The City of RENO, Texas, is n general lnw city and
<br />is en'titled to an extraterritori.nl jurisdiction consi.sting
<br />
<br />of nIl the contiguous unincorporated area, not a pnrt of any
<br />
<br />,
<br />i
<br />other city, within one-half (0.5) mile of it~ corporate
<br />limi t r. under the At' t.
<br />
<br />3. PARIS ilnd RENO ilrc 1l:i.tu:ltl'd within 5urh proximity
<br />
<br />to one :l\lother tlwt their !Jtntut.f'I'v extrntllrritClJ:ial'\uris-
<br />J .
<br />
<br />, .
<br />dictions overlnp one another.
<br />
<br />4. PARIS tmd RENO nH~ogni~(! thil t: the appn!"l':ionlnm\t 1)[
<br />
<br />the ex~raterr:ltori[\l jUrl!ldiction o'1L!rlnp bet:\"een tlw t\'10
<br />c.iti'es would be difficult because to do so would involve 1I
<br />
<br />determinntion of the respective populntions of ench city on
<br />
<br />September 1,1963, the effective d"l:r. of the Actj incrcwsC!:
<br />
<br />in population of each dty, if f,t1ch increar.er. r"i!led the
<br />
<br />','
<br />
<br />EXHIBIT 2
<br />
<br />"
<br />';
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />......'..
<br />
<br />,.
<br />
<br />',,' .
<br />
<br />~ "
<br />
<br />,", ',' """'.
<br />
<br />.'
<br />
|