Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br />.. <br /> <br />',I <br /> <br />AMENDMENTS TO <br />THE AGREEMENT Al)P.ORTIONING <br />EXTRATERRITORIAL .JURISDICTION OVERLAP, <br />DATED OCTOBER 8, 1984, <br />BETWEEN THE CITY OF PARIS AND THE CITY OF RENO <br /> <br />, I <br />I <br /> <br />That it is agreed by and between the City of Reno, Texas (hereinafter called "RENO"), and <br />the City of Paris, Texas (hereinafter called "PARIS"), as follows: . <br /> <br />F or and in consideration of the undertakings of each party hereto which is deemed to be a <br />valid and sufficient consideration to support this agreement, the Agreement entitled AGREEMENT <br />APPORTIONING EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OVERLAP (hereinafter called "the <br />1984 Agreement") and dated October 8, 1984, shall be amended as follows: <br /> <br />A. Paragraph I (d) shall be deleted; <br /> <br />B. Paragraph 3 shall be amended to read as follows: "There is .attached hereto as Exhibit <br />'A' a' Plat prepared by the city staff of PARIS reflecting and depicting the <br />apportionment. In the event of a conflict between the specific descriptions (whether <br />by metes and bounds or by distance from a known point or line) and the Plat attached <br />hereto, the specific descriptions of this Contract and the location of respective <br />reference points shall control."; <br /> <br />C. Paragraph 5 shall be amended by the addition of the following sentence: "Without <br />limiting the generality of the foregoing, RENO expressly consents to, ratifies, <br />confirms, and validates those annexations by PARIS which are set out in Exhibit <br />'C.'" The 1984 Agreement shall be amended by attachment of Exhibit "C."; <br /> <br />D. Paragraph 6 shall be amended by the deletion of the first sentence and modifying the <br />remainder to read as follows: "The parties have specifically agreed that all areas <br />shown on : Exhibit 'A' as lying within RENO's extraterritorial jurisdiction are <br />apportioned to RENO, but further understand and agree that the parties cannot, by the <br />Agreement, confer upon RENO extraterritorial jurisdiction beyond that conferred <br />upon RENO by the Legislature of the State of Texas. Accordingly, the parties <br />express their consensus that RENO should have the future right to expand, if <br />necessary, within the area apportioned to RENO in Exhibit "A". PARIS agrees that <br />its City Council will consent to properly supported. requests for annexation of <br />properties lying within the area apportioned to RENnin Exhibit "A".even though <br />such property may be within PARIS's extraterritorial Jurisdiction. <br /> <br />E. Paragraph 7 shall be added to read as follows: "In the event of a conflict between <br />descriptions of previously annexed areas by either City and lhe areas described on <br />Exhibits 'H' or 'C,' the descriptions in Exhibits 'H' or 'C,' respectively, shall <br /> <br />EXHIBIT A <br />