My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12 Discuss need for Charter Amendments
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2006
>
08 August
>
2006-08-14
>
12 Discuss need for Charter Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2006 3:28:10 PM
Creation date
8/9/2006 3:28:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
12
AGENDA - Type
MISCELLANEOUS
Description
Report & discussion of the need for comprehensive amendment of the Paris City Charter
AGENDA - Date
8/14/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />U~/U~/~UUD l~:J~ tAA ~UJ ~~(~~~l <br /> <br />lIlJ1\ .tlljtllJJW~ <br /> <br />Page 3. Mr. Tony Williams. August 4,2006. <br /> <br />Court DecIsions <br /> <br />Charter provisions are sometimes and over the years invalidated by court decisions. <br /> <br />For example, Section 17 specifies that no person can be qualified to serve as a city <br />councilman if that person is "found to be in arrears in the payment of any taxes or other <br />liability due to the city." (This policy is reiterated in Section 135.) But the courts have <br />held in recent years that such a qualification is not enforceable by a city. <br /> <br />Local Determination <br /> <br />It is not uncommon for variances in charters to occur as the result of the CIty manager <br />and/or the governing body deciding to simply ignore, as inconvenient, certain charter <br />provisions. Without some additional research, I can't be sure how many such variances <br />are now occurring in the Paris situation, but there are a number. <br /> <br />TIlE PROCESS OF COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT <br /> <br />As a consultant, I have assisted a number of cities that had charter situatioIl5 similar to <br />yours. The approach has been fairly standard. <br /> <br />The council acknowledges the problem and authorizes the retention of a qualified <br />consultant to assist in resolving it. Then, by resolution the council appoints a fifteen- <br />member group of citizens-usually referred to Wi the Charter Review Committee. In some <br />cases, the council designates a chairman for this committee, leaving it up to the <br />committee to elect a vice chairman; in other cases the council defers to the committee to <br />eject its own chairman and vice chairman. The city secretary ordinarily serves as <br />secreta.Iy to the committee. handling the posting of meetings, the circulation of agendas <br />and the recording of minutes. <br /> <br />This committee is given a simple charge: to review the existing city charter, front to back <br />and, with the help of the consultant, agree on specific amendments to all those sections in <br />the charter that are identified as outdated, not in force or otherwise not appropriate at this <br />time. From these determinations would come a written report and recommendations to <br />the COuncIl. <br /> <br />It is important for everyone involved to understand that this report is advisory only. The <br />council will retain the authority to decide which, if any, of the recommended <br />amendments will ultimately be placed on the ballot for voter consideration. <br /> <br />Once the council makes this determination. a number of steps must follow. A ballot must <br />be devised The proposed amendments must be mailed to all registered voters. (These <br />documents have to be transJated into Spanish.) The amendments have to be submitted to <br />U.S. Department of Justice for "pre-clearance." And various other administrative <br /> <br />~I)'j <br /> <br />r"" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.