Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OVERVIEW. 2007 <br /> <br />Employee Name Thomas E. Hunt. III <br /> <br />Title: Municipal Court JudQe <br /> <br />Performance Council Scoring by Council Person Total Average <br />Category (Initials for each Council Person) Points Points per <br /> 0-1 0-2 0-3 0-4 0-5 0-6 0-7 Category <br /> M.A.F. K.G. J.F. R.M. C.F. O.W. T.R. <br />(1) Fairness <br />(2) Follows the law <br />(3) Creates effective <br />punishments <br />(4) Expedites case load <br />(5) Performs <br />administrative duties <br />(6) Manages budget <br />(7) Magistrate functions <br />(8) Integrity <br />(9) Courtesy <br />(10) Interrelationships <br />(11) Communicates <br />effectively <br />AGGREGATE TOTAL POINTS (Add total points for categories (1) through (11)) <br />AVERAGE COMPOSITE EVALUATION RATING (Aaareaate Total Points) = <br /> (11 categories X 11 evaluators) <br /> <br />The Average Composite Evaluation Rating should be interpreted as follows: <br /> <br />~ A rating below 1.5 is unsatisfactory. <br /> <br />~ A rating between 1.5 and 2.4 is below average. <br /> <br />~ A rating between 2.5 and 3.4 is good. <br /> <br />~ A rating between 3.5 and 4.4 is very good. <br /> <br />~ A rating between 4.5 and 5.0 is outstanding. <br /> <br />,...- <br />