Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OVERVIEW. 2007 <br /> <br />Employee Name Tonv N. Williams <br /> <br />Title: City ManaQer <br /> <br />Performance Council Scoring by Council Person (Averages) Total Average <br />Category (Initials for each Council Person) Points Points per <br /> D-1 D-2 D - 3 D-4 D - 5 D-6 D-7 Category <br /> MAF. K.G. J.F. R.M. e.F. D.W. T.R. <br />(A) City Council <br />Relationships <br />(8) Fiscal Management <br />(C) General & Personnel <br />Management <br />(0) Community & Inter- <br />governmental relations <br />(E) Job Effectiveness <br />(F) Job Performance <br />AGGREGATE TOTAL POINTS (Add total points for categories (1) through (6)) <br />AVERAGE COMPOSITE EVALUATION RATING (Aaareaate Total Points) = <br /> (6 categories X 7 evaluators) . <br /> <br />The Average Composite Evaluation Rating should be interpreted as follows: <br /> <br />. A rating below 1 .5 is unsatisfactory. <br /> <br />. A rating between 1.5 and 2.4 is below average. <br /> <br />. A rating between 2.5 and 3.4 is good. <br /> <br />. A rating between 3.5 and 4.4 is very good. <br /> <br />. A rating between 4.5 and 5.0 is outstanding. <br /> <br />r" <br />