Laserfiche WebLink
<br />· Carbon Dioxide (C02). C02 is a greenhouse gas and the primary contributor to <br />global warming. C02 is responsible for the largest part of the manmade greenhouse <br />gas effect. <br /> <br />How is Texas currently doing with respect to these pollutants? <br /> <br />Several major regions of the state do not meet federal air quality standards for ozone, <br />including Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston-Galveston, and Beaumont-Port Arthur. Austin, <br />San Antonio, Corpus Christi, and parts of northeast Texas are on the verge of exceeding <br />the federal limits. <br /> <br />Texas currently leads the nation in toxic mercury emissions. Of the top eight plants in the <br />country in total mercury emissions, five are in Texas, including the top mercury polluter <br />in the country, TXU's Martin Lake plant. 1 <br /> <br />Texas is far and away the leading emitter of carbon dioxide in the country. Its total <br />emissions are over 50% more than those of California, the next-highest emitting state. If <br />Texas were a nation, it would rank seventh in the world in carbon dioxide emissions? <br /> <br />What impact would the sixteen proposed units have with respect to these pollutants? <br /> <br />· Nitrogen Oxides and Ozone. Existing air modeling indicates that the new plants <br />could significantly increase ozone levels in many parts of the state. For example, <br />ozone could increase by three parts per billion or more in the Austin area, which <br />would be enough to put Austin into non-attainment status. Models to date indicate <br />that ozone levels could increase by several parts per billion in the DFW area on days <br />when the wind blows from the south or southwest. Even higher increases are possible <br />in other areas of central Texas. <br /> <br />· Mercury. The new plants will emit in the range of two tons of mercury into the <br />atmosphere each year. For comparison, new EPA mercury rules, when fuHy <br />implemented, will require that all the power plants in the nation combined emit no <br />more than fifteen tons of mercury per year. 3 <br /> <br />· Particulate Matter. The plants will add over 20,000 tons of particulate matter to the <br />air every year. The EP A has just announced stricter PM standards, and it is possible <br />that areas of Texas will be in violation of the new standards. <br /> <br />1 Environmental Integrity Project, cited in Randy Lee Loftis, "Texas Power Plants Pack Emissions List," DALLAS <br />MORNING NEWS,)uly 28,2006. <br />2 U.S. Energy Information Administration, cited in Randy Lee Loftis, "Texas Cool to Confront Global Warming," <br />DALLAS MORNING NEWS, September 3,2006. <br />3 Summary of EP A rule available at Environmental Protection Agency website, <br />http://www.epa.gov/air/mercuryrule/basic.htm. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />"'~---'----"'-'-_."--"-'""~'- ..,._._..,-_._.,~'----._'-,...~_..~.._._----~~-_.. <br />