My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-E Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition (2)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2006
>
12 December
>
2006 12-11
>
08-E Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2006 7:56:37 AM
Creation date
12/8/2006 7:56:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
08-E
AGENDA - Type
RESOLUTION
Description
Approving Bylaws of the Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition and accepting membership in said Coalition
AGENDA - Date
12/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />What impact would the new plants have on the ozone situation in the Austin area? <br /> <br />Modeling to date indicates that the daily ozone levels in the Austin area could increase by <br />three parts per billion or more, and that the proposed TXU reductions could bring little or <br />no benefit to Austin. Adding three parts per billion would send the area above the level <br />the EP A has identified as dangerous to human health and place it in non-attainment <br />status. It would also effectively cancel out all of the recent efforts Austin has recently <br />made to improve its air quality. <br /> <br />What impact would the new plants have on the ozone situation in other parts of the state? <br /> <br />Preliminary modeling indicates that the impacts could be even greater on areas in central <br />Texas near Waco, and could increase ozone levels by six parts per billion or more in <br />those areas. It is unclear what impact these plants will have on the Houston non- <br />attainment area, because complete modeling hasn't been undertaken. Further studies are <br />needed to better understand these impacts and to understand impacts on other areas of the <br />state. <br /> <br />Doesn't Texas need more power generation c.apacity? <br /> <br />Yes. But we see no evidence that Texas will be facing a power shortage if it does not <br />immediately build all of the sixteen traditional coal plants as presently proposed. <br /> <br />ERCOT, the independent operator of the state's power grid, calculates a number called <br />the "reserve margin." This is the difference between the available generating capacity <br />and the estimated peak system load. ERCOT recommends that the state maintain a <br />minimum reserve margin of 12.5%.7 <br /> <br />ERCOT predicts that with no addition of generating capacity, the reserve margin is likely <br />to fall below 10% by 2009. But ERCOT also calculates that if all of the proposed coal- <br />fired units were built, the reserve margin would be 200/0 by 2009, almost 25% by 2010, <br />and about 23% by 20 II. 8 So if all of the proposed units were built, the reserve margin by <br />2011 would be almost double the recommended minimum. The many energy <br />conservation measures being undertaken by all electricity users may further reduce the <br />demand, over and above the current ERCOT projections. <br /> <br />7 Mark Armentrout (Chairman ofERCOT Board of Directors), "How Much Power Does Texas Need?" DALLAS <br />MORNING NEWS, September 17, 2006. <br />8 See "ERCOT Emergency Load Response, Sept. 15,2006, PUC Demand Response Workshop" available at <br />http://www.puc.state.tx.us. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />........---........-. .-.-.-..-....-,.. ................-r--.-... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.