My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-E Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition (2)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2006
>
12 December
>
2006 12-11
>
08-E Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2006 7:56:37 AM
Creation date
12/8/2006 7:56:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
08-E
AGENDA - Type
RESOLUTION
Description
Approving Bylaws of the Texas Clean Air Cities Coalition and accepting membership in said Coalition
AGENDA - Date
12/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Are you against coal altogether? <br /> <br />No. Coal is plentiful and is going to be a part of meeting our energy needs. In fact, we <br />encourage our state to become a leader in IGCC, which uses coal as the fuel source but <br />results in significantly lower emissions. For any traditional non-gasification coal plants <br />that are built now, we want to make sure that the emissions profiles in the permits are <br />reasonable, that the plants use the cleanest technology available, and that they don't <br />unnecessarily pollute the air. <br /> <br />We also question whether building sixteen traditional coal-fired plants at once is the right <br />solution for a state that already has three regions out of compliance with federal ozone <br />standards, already leads the nation in mercury emissions, and already leads the nation in <br />greenhouse gas emissions. <br /> <br />Don't the power companies know best what is economically feasible for power generation <br />in Texas? <br /> <br />The power companies certainly understand the economics of power generation and sale. <br />As profit-making companies who are responsible to their shareholders, that's their job. <br />But the cities also have "shareholders" to whom we are responsible: Texas citizens who <br />breathe the air, and who would pay the economic, environmental, and health costs of the <br />power companies' emissions. <br /> <br />Not every power company has the same view as TXU. For example, Wayne Leonard, <br />CEO of Entergy, told the Wall Street Journal that he believed it was "unacceptable" for <br />power companies to build lots of new plants without regard to the effects of carbon <br />dioxide emissions, and that unless new evidence emerges, "you stop what you're doing <br />because you're putting all mankind at risk.,,9 <br /> <br />Aren't the new plants going to create jobs and bring economic benefits to the communities <br />where they are to be built? <br /> <br />The new units would likely bring additional jobs and enhance the tax base of the local <br />communities. But clean plants bring just as many jobs and economic benefits as dirty <br />ones. And cleaner plants would have the added benefit of improving air quality and the <br />health of citizens locally and across the state. <br /> <br />Is intervention in the permit proceedings the best solution? <br /> <br />All decisions about the permitting of these plants will be made by the TCEQ. The only <br />way to ensure that our concerns are considered by the TCEQ is to become a party to the <br />proceedings through intervention. Intervening in the state permitting process means <br /> <br />9 Rebecca Smith, "As Emissions Restrictions Loom, TXll Bets Big on C..oal," WALL S'IREET JOURNAL, July 25, 2006. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />.. -----..".---'--------I-.."-'-.,.-~.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.