My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-12-07-Mins-Charter (2)
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
OTHER
>
CHARTER COMMITTEE
>
2006
>
2006-12-07-Mins-Charter (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 2:50:44 PM
Creation date
12/15/2006 11:22:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
2006
Doc Type
Minutes
CITY CLERK - Date
12/7/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEETING <br />OF THE CHARTER STUDY COMMITTEE, CITY OF PARIS <br />CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER <br />107 E. KAUFMAN STREET <br />PARIS, TEXAS <br />THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2006 <br />4:00 0'CLOCK P.M. <br />1. The Charter Study Committee meeting was called to order by City Manager, Tony <br />Williams, at 4:00 o'clock p.m. <br />The following members were present: <br />Marva Joe <br />Charles Waldrum <br />David Nabors <br />Charles Richards <br />Ozie Battle <br />Louise Hagood <br />Philip Cecil <br />David Hamilton <br />The following members were absent: <br />Bill Payne <br />Robert High <br />David House <br />Bobby Walters (alternate) <br />Also, present were Tony Williams, City Manager; Janice Ellis, City Clerk; and Monte <br />Akers, legal advisor. <br />2. Approval of minutes. <br />Subject to correcting the adjournment time to reflect 5:42 p.m., David Nabors made <br />a motion to approve the minutes. Motion carried, 8 ayes - 0 nays. <br />3. Discussion of possible ballot groupings. <br />Monte Akers referred the Committee to his memo of November 29, 2006, and <br />reviewed four different scenarios. Mr. Akers stated he conferred with four other attorneys, <br />as to whether or not corrections could be made with one single proposition, such as the <br />correction of misspelled word and grammatical errors. All four attorneys believed these <br />type of cleanup items could be addressed in one single proposition. <br />With regard to other non-substantive, cleanup issues, such as elimination of <br />obsolete provisions, all four attorneys expressed one proposition would be legal. However, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.