My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-12-07-Mins-Charter (2)
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
OTHER
>
CHARTER COMMITTEE
>
2006
>
2006-12-07-Mins-Charter (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 2:50:44 PM
Creation date
12/15/2006 11:22:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
2006
Doc Type
Minutes
CITY CLERK - Date
12/7/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charter Study Committee <br />December 7, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br />two consecutive two year terms. Monte Akers pointed out that the Charter did not state the <br />term of office to be two years and that needed to be added. <br />(8) Section 17 (Qualifications). Chairperson Philip Cecil inquired of the members if <br />anyone thought twenty-one was too strict. Marva Joe said at eighteen you could go to war <br />and vote. Louise Hagood preferred twenty-one. Chairperson Philip Cecil asked those in <br />favor of keeping twenty-one to raise their hands. David Nabors and Louise Hagood raised <br />their hands. The other six committee members were in favor of age eighteen. <br />All Committee Members were in favor of keeping the requirement of residing in the <br />district for twelves months as a qualification of running for council. <br />With regard to a candidate being in arrears in the payment of taxes, Monte advised <br />the Committee this qualification needed to be amended. He stated that due to a federal <br />lawsuit, the City could have some legal problems with this being a qualification. <br />Charles Waldrum suggested that the qualification dealing with convictions be <br />reworded to define conviction. David Hamilton agreed. Chairperson Philip Cecil asked Mr. <br />Waldrum and Mr. Hamilton to get together and bring something back to the next meeting <br />regarding this subject. <br />Subject to an issue being brought back regarding convictions, the Committee <br />approved the changes to Section 17 as set out above. <br />(11) Section 23 (Council not to interfere in appointments or removals). Chairperson <br />Philip Cecil said they needed to address the consequences for violation of this section. <br />Monte Akers suggested they add a sentence stating that multiple and willful violations shall <br />be grounds for removal from office, after an investigation by the Council and a public <br />hearing. The Committee was in agreement. <br />(12) Section 29 (Induction into office; meetings). Philip Cecil stated the open <br />meetings had been a controversial topic, because the Charter does not follow state law. <br />A Motion to allow City Council to follow the Open Meetings Act governed by State Law was <br />made by David Hamilton and seconded by Louise Hagood. Motion carried, 8 ayes - 0 <br />nays. <br />(16) Section 60 (Emergency appropriations). Monte Akers informed the Committee <br />that having the one-hundred resident qualified voter stipulation added an additional hurdle <br />in response to amend the budget. It becomes extremely important during homeland <br />security issues. A Motion to remove the one-hundred resident qualified voter stipulation <br />was made by David Nabors and seconded by David Hamilton. Motion carried, 8 ayes - 0 <br />nays. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.