My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03 P&Z Minutes & Reports
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2007
>
01 January
>
2007 01-08
>
03 P&Z Minutes & Reports
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2007 12:41:44 PM
Creation date
1/4/2007 12:36:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
03
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
Planning & Zoning Minutes and Reports
AGENDA - Date
1/8/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />a request for a mobile home, not only is the zoning changed for the specific <br />use permit but the underlying zoning of the property is changed to SF-3. The <br />Council thinks that this poses a problem because there might be an occasion <br />when you have a tract of land in the long term you might not want to make SF- <br />3 zoning because this could create maybe one SF-3 zoned lot in the middle of <br />Industrial zoning. It might be better if the underlying zoning did not have to <br />be changed but rather leave as it is and put a specific use permit on it that is <br />good for 5 years. It has been suggested that maybe instead of saying any <br />zoning classification that it could be done in any zQning classification except <br />SF-1 and SF-2. <br /> <br />The Commission stated they felt this ordinance would make a good stop-gap <br />measure while a new subdivision ordinance was being developed; however, <br />they wondered if some research could be done to determine why it currently <br />says what it does. They wanted to know what the reasoning behind it was. <br />Lisa Wright advised the Commission that there would need to be a <br />comprehensive look at the effect this would have on the entire ordinance, <br />because references to setbacks and other relevant items would need to be <br />changed as well. <br /> <br />Motion was made to table the recommendation by Fran Neeley, seconded by <br />Bobby Myers, until the new City Attorney can review the ordinance and make <br />a recommendation as to whether the ordinance should remain as is or if it <br />should be revised. Motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes and 0 nays. <br /> <br />9. Consideration of and possible action on amendments to the Future land Use <br />Map, which is a part ofthe Comprehensive Plan, as it relates to the southeast <br />quadrant of Paris. <br /> <br />Maps were turned in to the Director of Community Development. No further <br />action was taken. <br /> <br />10. Consideration of and possible action on amendments to the Future land Use <br />Map, which is a part of the Comprehensive Plan, as it relates to the northeast <br />quadrant of Paris. <br /> <br />Maps were turned in to the Director of Community Development. No further <br />action was taken. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. <br /> <br />APPROVED THIS 2ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2007 <br /> <br />Reeves Hayter, Chairman <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.