Laserfiche WebLink
<br />this section to follow State law with regard to the May uniform election date. <br /> <br />Section 95 (How to get name on ballot). It was a consensus of the Committee <br />to amend this section to follow State law. <br /> <br />Section 99 (Canvassing elections). Charles Waldrum said they should add the <br />run-off language to the section. It was a consensus of the Committee to amend this <br />section to add the run-off election language and to amend this section to follow State law. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />SeC?~ion 107 (Submis_~ion to electors). It was a consensus of the Committee to <br />amend this section to change-the electors to voters and to amend this section to fol/ow <br />State law. <br /> <br />Section 114 (Recall election). It was a consensus of the Committee to amend this <br />section to follow State law. '. <br /> <br />Section 121 (Procedure) and Section 122 (Term and Condition). Monte Akers <br />recommending not amending the sections, since the Committee was not going to address <br />the franchise sections. It was a consensus of the Committee to leave the sections as <br />written in the Charter. <br /> <br />Section 131 (Publicity of records). It was a consensus of the Committee to <br />amend the section follow State law. <br /> <br />Section 136 (Oath). Mr. Akers suggested changing the Oath to follow the Oath <br />prescribed by the State. David Nabors expressed concern about changing the Oath, as <br />did Charles Waldrum and Robert High. It was a consensus of the Committee to leave the <br />section as written in the Charter. <br /> <br />Section 150 (Submission of the Charter to electors). Charles Waldrum <br />suggested they delete this section. It was a consensus of the Committee to delete the <br />Section. <br /> <br />The Committee discussed work to be done at future meetings. They will address <br />their presentation to the Community in an effort to speak as one voice. Ernie Clark <br />informed the Committee that he would ask Council to consider setting a special meeting <br />to review and discuss the Propositions. Due to a conflict in scheduling, Chairperson Cecil <br />rescheduled the meeting from Thursday, January 25th to Friday, January 26th at 4:00 p.m. <br /> <br />7. Adjournment. <br /> <br />There being no further business, the meetin was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />,.. <br />! <br />